![]() ![]() |
Dec 1 2007, 12:22 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 31 Joined: 27-December 06 Member No.: 13,475 |
Being very happy with pdaXrom on my 860 I wanted to work(!) with it on the
road. Well. BUMMER. I had it suspended in the evening and it would not wake up, not even boot again in the morning. After some investigation I found the battery was comlpetely drained. Some experimentation showed, that my Z sucked power while sleeping. Over night it would return to 100%, reported in /proc/apm. Only a few hours later, disconneted from the AC plug but suspended, it was down to 45 %. Cacko and Angstrom did not behave that way. Is this a known issue? Can I provide further info for someone 'who just knows'? detlef 860er, pdaXrom r197 sp8, 1 SD card, 1 CF card, no wifi connected. |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2007, 02:49 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 31 Joined: 27-December 06 Member No.: 13,475 |
Is this a known issue? Can I provide further info for someone 'who just knows'? Some numbers: Before I went to bed > cat /proc/apm 1.13 1.2 0x02 0x00 0x00 0x01 95% -1 suspend Z In the morning > cat /proc/apm 1.13 1.2 0x02 0x00 0x02 0x04 5% -1 plug in AC; wait about 10 MINUTES ?! > cat /proc/apm 1.13 1.2 0x02 0x01 0x03 0x08 100% -1 Hmm. What do these numbers mean? Is there a serious bug in apm? Or do these numbers indicate a dying battery? Any hints appreciated detlef |
|
|
|
Dec 2 2007, 05:33 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 127 Joined: 5-January 07 Member No.: 13,705 |
Same problem in my C1000.
That is why I back to 1.1 beta3 |
|
|
|
Dec 3 2007, 04:31 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 8-August 06 Member No.: 10,687 |
Same problem in my C1000. That is why I back to 1.1 beta3 I have noticed a similar thing, but only If I suspend while powered from the mains and then disconnect the mains. If I suspend while not being powered from the mains then it seems to suspend fine and doesn't eat the battery. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 26th May 2013 - 12:32 AM |