 C1000 And Angstrom ? Forget It !, Angstrom Stinks |
OESF Forums > Distros, Development, and Model Specific Forums > Model Specific Forums > C1000/3x00 Hardware  |
 May 13 2009, 04:46 AM
Post
#1
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 85 Joined: 7-April 08 Member No.: 21,602  |
Ahh.. Angstrom,
Supposed to be the Bees-Knees of ARM OS's. I think this OS is a Joke. Mostly due to its rotten capabilities in the USB department. It wants to force me to give up my beautiful Z C1000 for an 8086 Clone, an OQO 1Ghz Pocket running Backtrack 3 no less. Aren't we all just a little tired of 8086 world domination ? Isn't there someone out there in Angstrom land that can fix our USB woes and put ARM Systems up there in lights where it belongs along with the 8086's of this world ? We have waited long enough to get an Angstrom that ACTUALLY WORKS .  I would love to have a go at solving this problem myself, but I don't have the time. Perhaps this is the problem with others ? If there is anyone out there willing to help with this issue we want to hear ! |
 |
 
|
|
May 13 2009, 04:57 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 101 Joined: 23-June 04 Member No.: 3,800 |
Hmmm, a completely uncalled for attack. I notice you don't actually describe your problems. I have seen no bug reports or emails to the Angstrom mailing lists.
I'm going to guess the problem is PEBCAK |
|
|
|
|
May 13 2009, 07:32 AM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 95 Joined: 5-June 06 From: Valencia Member No.: 10,061 |
QUOTE(XorA @ May 13 2009, 02:57 PM)  I'm going to guess the problem is PEBCAK the silliest acronym I've ever read. |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th June 2013 - 04:20 PM |