 CloverPaint |
  |
 May 27 2004, 06:11 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 33 Joined: 9-May 04 Member No.: 3,016  |
Anyone tested this?
Layers, effects, zoom options + png/jpg/bmp export... http://pda-paint.cocolog-nifty.com/clover/ |
 |
 
|
|
May 27 2004, 08:39 AM
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 162 Joined: 11-December 03 Member No.: 1,152 |
That looks freakin amazing (and only ~100kb!!) I'll be testing this out shortly...
Yz |
|
|
|
|
May 27 2004, 11:00 AM
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 154 Joined: 1-May 04 From: Discworld Member No.: 3,089 |
Drat! Only for the SL-C700, 750, 760, 860...........
I have a 5600. |
|
|
|
|
May 27 2004, 11:53 AM
Post
#4
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1,497 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Germany Member No.: 907 |
Hmm... my japanese is rusty... any idea what license this comes with?
|
|
|
|
|
May 27 2004, 05:24 PM
Post
#5
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1,164 Joined: 17-December 03 From: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA Member No.: 1,219 |
QUOTE Ｑ：CloverPaintはGPLですか？
Ａ：GPLではありません．CloverPaintはTrolltech社のQtopiaライセンス（商用）ですが無償でバイナリのみ配布しています．個人的にGPLではなくBSDライセンスが望ましいと考えていますので，Trolltech社の気が変わるのを待っています． Basically the author says that because the app was developed using the commercial Qtopia licence it can't be GPL. The author also suggests that Trolltech want a BSD style licence - not real sure here, stretching my limited Japanses to the limit. The author also hopes Trolltech will change there mind about GPLing source developed with qtopia commercial licences. Stu |
|
|
|
|
May 27 2004, 05:32 PM
Post
#6
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 696 Joined: 17-January 04 Member No.: 1,468 |
That doesn't make sense to me... just because you have a commercial Trolltech license, you're barred from using the GPL version? Is that right? lpotter?
|
|
|
|
|
May 27 2004, 07:14 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 42 Joined: 27-May 04 From: Corvallis, OR Member No.: 3,469 |
Damn....I guess those of us with lowly 5500s are outta luck?
|
|
|
|
|
May 27 2004, 08:52 PM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1,164 Joined: 17-December 03 From: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA Member No.: 1,219 |
Your not barred from using the GPL version, but I think there are widgets or something that are different between the 2 and if you have developed the software using the commercial licemce you can't just compile it with the GPL version and release it as GPL - at least that was the arguement that the author of Qt!TreeExplorer put forth for not releasing the source to his free version. Seem that a lot of the Jaapnese developers have the commercial version of qtopia - maybe they had a sale on or something
 .
Doesn't make sense to me but then not many licence issues do Stu |
|
|
|
|
May 27 2004, 11:13 PM
Post
#9
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1,176 Joined: 3-October 03 From: UK Member No.: 547 |
I thought it was only the other way round; if you developed using the GPL'ed SDK then you cannot later start using the commercial SDK with the same source even if you did not release it. I've never heard about not being able to release your code under GPL if you use the commercial SDK. You should be able to do whatever you want with the source if you use the commercial SDK.
|
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 06:34 AM |