![]() ![]() |
Aug 9 2006, 09:31 AM
Post
#46
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 692 Joined: 27-January 04 From: Canada Member No.: 1,564 |
QUOTE(grog @ Aug 8 2006, 11:30 AM) I think the pc is now confused. I recognized the Z as a new device, even though I had previously tried this with rc4. I had to point it at the usb8023k.sys driver again & the new network icon now says it's "Linux USB Ethernet/RNDIS Gadget #2". When I set the ip address, it complained that it had the same address as the "Linux USB Ethernet/RNDIS Gadget", but that isn't shown anywhere so I can delete or change it's settings. So I think this may be an address conflict problem between the two devices, but I can't see any way of removing the first one. No headway yet. Haven't had time to test on XP, the 2000 box isn't able to ping 192.168.129.201, even though it shows the device attached & the network icon shows connected. |
|
|
|
Aug 11 2006, 04:59 AM
Post
#47
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4,515 Joined: 25-October 03 From: Bath, UK Member No.: 464 |
QUOTE I think the pc is now confused. I recognized the Z as a new device, even though I had previously tried this with rc4. I had to point it at the usb8023k.sys driver again & the new network icon now says it's "Linux USB Ethernet/RNDIS Gadget #2". When I set the ip address, it complained that it had the same address as the "Linux USB Ethernet/RNDIS Gadget", but that isn't shown anywhere so I can delete or change it's settings. So I think this may be an address conflict problem between the two devices, but I can't see any way of removing the first one. This is standard, I get this warning whenever I create a new connection with the same IP address. After your ping has failed, I'd be interested to see the output of: on the Windows machine: 'ipconfig' and 'route print' and on the Zaurus: 'ifconfig' and 'route' Si |
|
|
|
Aug 11 2006, 06:50 AM
Post
#48
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 692 Joined: 27-January 04 From: Canada Member No.: 1,564 |
QUOTE(lardman @ Aug 11 2006, 06:59 AM) QUOTE I think the pc is now confused. I recognized the Z as a new device, even though I had previously tried this with rc4. I had to point it at the usb8023k.sys driver again & the new network icon now says it's "Linux USB Ethernet/RNDIS Gadget #2". When I set the ip address, it complained that it had the same address as the "Linux USB Ethernet/RNDIS Gadget", but that isn't shown anywhere so I can delete or change it's settings. So I think this may be an address conflict problem between the two devices, but I can't see any way of removing the first one. This is standard, I get this warning whenever I create a new connection with the same IP address. After your ping has failed, I'd be interested to see the output of: on the Windows machine: 'ipconfig' and 'route print' and on the Zaurus: 'ifconfig' and 'route' Windows: CODE C:\>ping 192.168.129.201 Pinging 192.168.129.201 with 32 bytes of data: Request timed out. Request timed out. Ping statistics for 192.168.129.201: Packets: Sent = 2, Received = 0, Lost = 2 (100% loss), Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds: Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms Control-C ^C C:\>ipconfig Windows 2000 IP Configuration Ethernet adapter zaurus: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.129.200 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection: Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : federated.ca IP Address. . . . . . . . . . . . : 172.28.14.63 Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.0.0 Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 172.28.10.3 C:\>route print =========================================================================== Interface List 0x1 ........................... MS TCP Loopback interface 0x1000004 ...00 0f 1f 88 76 df ...... Broadcom NetXtreme Gigabit Ethernet Driver 0x3000002 ...e6 6d e4 94 22 ad ...... Linux 2.6.16/pxa2xx_udc =========================================================================== =========================================================================== Active Routes: Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.28.10.3 172.28.14.63 1 127.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 172.28.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.28.14.63 172.28.14.63 1 172.28.14.63 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 172.28.255.255 255.255.255.255 172.28.14.63 172.28.14.63 1 192.168.129.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.129.200 192.168.129.200 1 192.168.129.200 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 192.168.129.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.129.200 192.168.129.200 1 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 172.28.14.63 172.28.14.63 1 224.0.0.0 224.0.0.0 192.168.129.200 192.168.129.200 1 255.255.255.255 255.255.255.255 172.28.14.63 172.28.14.63 1 Default Gateway: 172.28.10.3 =========================================================================== Persistent Routes: None Z CODE + ifconfig
lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:13 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:13 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:1192 (1.1 KiB) TX bytes:1192 (1.1 KiB) usb0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 46:9E:7A:D5:9C:1D inet addr:192.168.129.201 Bcast:192.168.129.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 inet6 addr: fe80::449e:7aff:fed5:9c1d/64 Scope:Link UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:3 errors:1 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:1 TX packets:18 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:84 (84.0 B) TX bytes:2196 (2.1 KiB) + route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.129.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 usb0 default 192.168.129.200 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 usb0 |
|
|
|
Aug 11 2006, 11:30 PM
Post
#49
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,565 Joined: 7-April 05 From: Sydney, Australia Member No.: 6,806 |
QUOTE 192.168.129.200 255.255.255.255 127.0.0.1 127.0.0.1 1 192.168.129.255 255.255.255.255 192.168.129.200 192.168.129.200 1 looks to me as if the interface is set up incorectly on the windows PC, the broadcast address below it seems to be fine but the other just points back to itself |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 04:06 PM |