OESF | ELSI | pdaXrom | OpenZaurus | Zaurus Themes | Community Links | Ibiblio

IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Wsj's Recent Comments On Windows Vista
freizugheit
post Apr 18 2007, 06:24 PM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 409
Joined: 7-November 03
Member No.: 811



"
......
Last fall, I advised average consumers with aging PCs to hang on until new Vista PCs emerged, rather than trying to upgrade existing models. I still believe that was the right course, because Windows upgrades are so tricky. But it turns out that even new Vista PCs have two big downsides.

First, Vista isn't all that exciting a replacement for Windows XP. It's much prettier and has much better searching, and Microsoft claims it has much stronger security, although you still need add-on security software.

Second, to an extent that amazes me, makers of Windows software and hardware have failed to update their products to work smoothly, or to work at all, with Vista. In my house, for example, the only built-in Vista printer driver I can find for my printer doesn't allow the two-sided printing I can do with Windows XP and Apple Macintosh computers.

So, if you desperately need a new Windows PC, be prepared to be underwhelmed and to be frustrated by incompatible software and hardware. And if you're not desperate, you might wait another six months or so for the software and hardware to catch up -- and for Microsoft to issue some bug fixes.

Or you could buy a Mac instead. I still believe the best desktop computer on the market for mainstream, nontechnical consumers is the Apple iMac. It has gorgeous hardware and superior built-in software. Its operating system, Mac OS X, includes most of the key new features of Vista. And the iMac can even run Vista, along with its own operating system, if you need the occasional Windows program.

Apple has delayed until October the release of its new operating-system version, Leopard. But it's almost certain that any Mac you buy now will upgrade to it smoothly. (See my Mossberg's Mailbox for more details.) And the Mac is still largely free of the security problems that add such hassles to using a Windows PC.
......."
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Capn_Fish
post Apr 18 2007, 06:38 PM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 2,350
Joined: 30-July 06
Member No.: 10,575



QUOTE(freizugheit @ Apr 18 2007, 09:24 PM)
Or you could buy a Mac instead.
*

Or run Linux. smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
freizugheit
post Apr 18 2007, 07:00 PM
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 409
Joined: 7-November 03
Member No.: 811



With the use of virtulization software, like Parellels Desktop on Intel Macs, one can run most of 32-bit OSes as he wishes.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Cresho
post Apr 18 2007, 08:20 PM
Post #4





Group: Moderators
Posts: 1,619
Joined: 29-October 03
From: Los Angeles
Member No.: 809



well, I told many to do the same and now they ask me about it again and I tell them, "Either you spend tons of cash and i charge 100 bucks labor just to slap something compatible together or get a cheap dell, HP, or those other kinds of hardware venders cuz your old rig is void!"..end of line.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Ling
post Apr 19 2007, 02:45 AM
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 352
Joined: 3-June 04
From: Virginia, US
Member No.: 3,563



QUOTE(freizugheit @ Apr 18 2007, 10:00 PM)
With the use of virtulization software, like Parellels Desktop on Intel Macs, one can run most of 32-bit OSes as he wishes.
*


Agreed, but to be fair, WSJ needs to show the costs for these "similar" systems. The Mc-Hardware is not cheap. Parallels is not cheap, etc. May still be the right answer, but the advice without pricing is a bit disingenuous.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 27th November 2014 - 03:50 AM