![]() ![]() |
Jun 7 2007, 10:47 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2,003 Joined: 16-April 04 From: the Netherlands && /dev/null Member No.: 2,882 |
Don't want to go far off-topic from the "Package Repository" thread, so let me start a new one here concentrating on managing the ports collection on Zaurus.
Two questions to start with: Q1. What would be the easiest AND safest way to clean up the sources fetched and the files created during make? I see people talking about "cd /usr/ports && make distclean". Does it work for Z? I just want to be cautious not to mess up the port tree. Q2. What would be the best way to keep the ports collection most up to date? I learn cvsup from http://www.openbsd101.com/updating.html#u6, however when i tried to set it up, there was an error saying cvsup is for i386 machines only. It seems another way is to overwrite /usr/ports with the latest ports.tar.gz from pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/, but it takes so quite a long while to uncompress the tarball. The nice thing about cvsup is that it only update the ports when application while leaving the unchanged ports intact, so it's fast and more convenient. Any hope or method to get cvsup running on Zaurus? |
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 10:03 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,019 Joined: 15-February 05 From: France Member No.: 6,477 |
QUOTE(ZDevil @ Jun 7 2007, 08:47 PM) Q1. What would be the easiest AND safest way to clean up the sources fetched and the files created during make? I see people talking about "cd /usr/ports && make distclean". Does it work for Z? I just want to be cautious not to mess up the port tree. i think there's no problem in doing the make dist=clean i've already done it and you'll gain many bytes ! |
|
|
|
Jun 7 2007, 10:11 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,019 Joined: 15-February 05 From: France Member No.: 6,477 |
QUOTE(ZDevil @ Jun 7 2007, 08:47 PM) Q2. What would be the best way to keep the ports collection most up to date? I learn cvsup from http://www.openbsd101.com/updating.html#u6, however when i tried to set it up, there was an error saying cvsup is for i386 machines only. It seems another way is to overwrite /usr/ports with the latest ports.tar.gz from pub/OpenBSD/snapshots/, but it takes so quite a long while to uncompress the tarball. The nice thing about cvsup is that it only update the ports when application while leaving the unchanged ports intact, so it's fast and more convenient. Any hope or method to get cvsup running on Zaurus? look here : http://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=20790 i think you'll find answers to many of your questions by the way i've compiled mplayer yesterday (night!) , i'll give it a try later |
|
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 01:31 AM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2,003 Joined: 16-April 04 From: the Netherlands && /dev/null Member No.: 2,882 |
Thanks! I should follow the posts here first. It seems sometimes what is said in the official documentation is not totally applicable to Z.
|
|
|
|
Jun 8 2007, 11:33 PM
Post
#5
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,019 Joined: 15-February 05 From: France Member No.: 6,477 |
|
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 03:42 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,019 Joined: 15-February 05 From: France Member No.: 6,477 |
there's something i don't understand with ports building :
assuming you've untared ports.tar.gz in /usr, why is openbsd always fetching some sources on the network ? should all necessary sources yet be in /usr/ports ??? another question: if i've no network on the zaurus, can i download some source files on my destkop, put it on a cf card and have the make process find this xxx.tar.bz2 file ??? if yes, how can i do this ? |
|
|
|
Jun 12 2007, 11:29 PM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2,003 Joined: 16-April 04 From: the Netherlands && /dev/null Member No.: 2,882 |
No, the ports.tar.gz (just a tarball of 10MB+) does not contain the sources tarballs itself. It only contains the portlist and the makefiles.
I think you can put the source files on a card, and then do a symlink from the correct location on the port tree, e.g. devel/chmlib. A glance at the existing source files should tell where to put them. Or perhaps simply do a symlink of the whole port tree to a path of a memory card will do? But then one tradeoff is dependency tracking and patching may not work, because all the dependent program sources and patches are downloaded automatically at the beginning of the build process. |
|
|
|
Jun 13 2007, 03:40 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,019 Joined: 15-February 05 From: France Member No.: 6,477 |
QUOTE(ZDevil @ Jun 13 2007, 09:29 AM) No, the ports.tar.gz (just a tarball of 10MB+) does not contain the sources tarballs itself. It only contains the portlist and the makefiles. ok i understand better ! well, so is it possible to download ALL needed files at the start ot the compilation process THEN compile all sources ??? |
|
|
|
Jun 20 2007, 01:02 PM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 298 Joined: 8-July 06 From: United Kingdom for now.... Member No.: 10,349 |
QUOTE(jpmatrix @ Jun 13 2007, 11:40 AM) QUOTE(ZDevil @ Jun 13 2007, 09:29 AM) No, the ports.tar.gz (just a tarball of 10MB+) does not contain the sources tarballs itself. It only contains the portlist and the makefiles. ok i understand better ! well, so is it possible to download ALL needed files at the start ot the compilation process THEN compile all sources ??? I think it's make fetch but I'm not 100% sure. |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 25th May 2013 - 12:11 AM |