![]() ![]() |
Sep 23 2007, 04:30 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 44 Joined: 28-August 04 Member No.: 4,412 |
Hi, was playing with the 4.2 snapshot yesterday but couldn't run a lot of programs like X which required 4.1 libs. I installed 4.1 lafter that and while trying to grab some precompiled packahes, i found that a lot of the packages required libraries like libX11.so.10.0 that was in 4.2. So did I miss any steps in installing 4.1? I did install 4.1 ipk->install OpenBSD->ftp install of 4.1-> trying to pkg_add from the depositories.
|
|
|
|
Sep 24 2007, 02:37 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2,003 Joined: 16-April 04 From: the Netherlands && /dev/null Member No.: 2,882 |
QUOTE(xdivider @ Sep 24 2007, 02:30 AM) Hi, was playing with the 4.2 snapshot yesterday but couldn't run a lot of programs like X which required 4.1 libs. I installed 4.1 lafter that and while trying to grab some precompiled packahes, i found that a lot of the packages required libraries like libX11.so.10.0 that was in 4.2. So did I miss any steps in installing 4.1? I did install 4.1 ipk->install OpenBSD->ftp install of 4.1-> trying to pkg_add from the depositories. Yes, the 4.2 system cannot use 4.1 packages ... So may want to use the 4.2 packages in my feeds and start from there. |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2007, 06:27 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 44 Joined: 28-August 04 Member No.: 4,412 |
QUOTE(ZDevil @ Sep 24 2007, 10:37 PM) QUOTE(xdivider @ Sep 24 2007, 02:30 AM) Hi, was playing with the 4.2 snapshot yesterday but couldn't run a lot of programs like X which required 4.1 libs. I installed 4.1 lafter that and while trying to grab some precompiled packahes, i found that a lot of the packages required libraries like libX11.so.10.0 that was in 4.2. So did I miss any steps in installing 4.1? I did install 4.1 ipk->install OpenBSD->ftp install of 4.1-> trying to pkg_add from the depositories. Yes, the 4.2 system cannot use 4.1 packages ... So may want to use the 4.2 packages in my feeds and start from there. When I installed the 4.2 snapshot directly, there was a lot of programs like X that needs 4.1 libs. So The correct install path for 4.2 is openbsd install -> 4.1 -> 4.2 upgrade b4 installing 3rd parties? |
|
|
|
Sep 24 2007, 10:54 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2,003 Joined: 16-April 04 From: the Netherlands && /dev/null Member No.: 2,882 |
QUOTE(xdivider @ Sep 25 2007, 04:27 AM) When I installed the 4.2 snapshot directly, there was a lot of programs like X that needs 4.1 libs. So The correct install path for 4.2 is openbsd install -> 4.1 -> 4.2 upgrade b4 installing 3rd parties? I am not sure if this is the case. I simply installed 4.2 right away and then the 4.2 packages. |
|
|
|
Sep 25 2007, 12:00 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 44 Joined: 28-August 04 Member No.: 4,412 |
QUOTE(ZDevil @ Sep 25 2007, 06:54 AM) QUOTE(xdivider @ Sep 25 2007, 04:27 AM) When I installed the 4.2 snapshot directly, there was a lot of programs like X that needs 4.1 libs. So The correct install path for 4.2 is openbsd install -> 4.1 -> 4.2 upgrade b4 installing 3rd parties? I am not sure if this is the case. I simply installed 4.2 right away and then the 4.2 packages. Found out why. 2 problems with a clean 4.2 snapshot 1) /usr/local/lib and /usr/X11R6/lib not in the ldconfig cache. Manually refreshed 2) Some packages needs libc.so.40.3. in 4.1 but not 4.2. Softlinked to the libc.so.42.0 |
|
|
|
Sep 25 2007, 12:25 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2,003 Joined: 16-April 04 From: the Netherlands && /dev/null Member No.: 2,882 |
Did you do upgrade or clean install?
I suppose a clean install will work. |
|
|
|
Sep 25 2007, 12:31 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 44 Joined: 28-August 04 Member No.: 4,412 |
QUOTE(ZDevil @ Sep 25 2007, 08:25 AM) Tried both. The key point is 4.1 installs libc.so.40.3 and 4.2 installs libc.so.42.0 only. A soft link to libc.so.41.0 is needed. The part that make me wonder is that the snapshot seem to have forgotten about /usr/local/lib and /usr/X11R6/lib. I assumed if I tried to upgrade from 4.1 which works out of box, then the ld cache is generated automatically. Din work that way however. |
|
|
|
Sep 25 2007, 08:34 AM
Post
#8
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2,003 Joined: 16-April 04 From: the Netherlands && /dev/null Member No.: 2,882 |
It's a pity that I cannot look into this for the moment, as my 3200 is now trying out Debian (Titchy Linux). Perhaps other skilled hands will help you out.
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 20th June 2013 - 01:37 AM |