![]() ![]() |
Jan 19 2005, 08:42 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 36 Joined: 19-December 04 Member No.: 5,974 |
I spotted this over at ZDnet, could be interesting, dont know how it will work out, but it's potentially a good thing. hopefully It will end up providing some competition for Sharp (Better hardware / prices!), and spread the use of Linux in PDA's to europe and the US, as sharp has stopped suplying them:
"IBM will use Trolltech's Linux-based application platform to pose a challenge to software from Palm and Microsoft" http://news.zdnet.co.uk/software/developer...,2130499,00.htm *Sorry, I didn't originally realise this was such an old story, but does anyone know if anything came of it, or if anyone appart from Sharp is considering using linux on a PDA?* |
|
|
|
Jan 19 2005, 10:59 AM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 451 Joined: 27-November 03 From: Brisbane, Australia Member No.: 1,001 |
This is a reference platform.
|
|
|
|
Jan 19 2005, 12:11 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 668 Joined: 3-December 03 From: US Member No.: 1,034 |
lpotter, I must give this to you - you really know how to keep out hopes afloat :-)
without telling us anything at all. and after the way Sharp let us all down (in the US), your efforts to inject in some enthusiasm in the developper community in every little way counts a lot - though I dont really know towards what end - since you dont seem to divulge much |
|
|
|
Jan 19 2005, 02:56 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 1,176 Joined: 3-October 03 From: UK Member No.: 547 |
It's also an old story that got posted a while ago (Notice the Feb 2003 date on the article).
I'm guessing it's of more use in the enterprise market than consumer. I wish someone would do something like that over here in the UK. Then I could recommend the handhelds as wireless stores and packing terminals at our factory and get paid for playing^W developing on a Linux PDA |
|
|
|
Jan 20 2005, 03:42 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 169 Joined: 15-March 04 Member No.: 2,327 |
|
|
|
|
Jan 23 2005, 06:54 AM
Post
#6
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 608 Joined: 21-June 04 From: The Netherlands Member No.: 3,774 |
QUOTE(acpkendo @ Jan 20 2005, 03:42 PM) Could be this little beauty? As it was explained, it was a reference design, and no one that I know of picked it up. They didn't see the integration coming, and now the design is seriously missing communication features. |
|
|
|
Jan 23 2005, 08:44 PM
Post
#7
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,821 Joined: 13-September 04 From: Wasilla Ak. Member No.: 4,572 |
A shame. surely the communications features could be tacked on to this design, with a few other minor tweaks and upgrades (it is a little short of ram for example). What are we really takning about? bleutooth 8211 (and a "phone card" to make the fcc happy?) and maybe usb?
something that more appraoches "opensource:..i guess "openspec?" hardware would be fabulous. I'd think a corp that made them would have no trouble selling 'em..if the feature set was contemporary |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2005, 08:52 AM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 608 Joined: 21-June 04 From: The Netherlands Member No.: 3,774 |
"minor tweaks" is what you do if you want to end up with a semi-working solution. First generation S/E phones are a great example, as are the Z.
They totally lack in Integration (of the the software with the hardware, and with a normal desktop). It's all very nice but in the end it'd still requier a degree to operate. IBM is very good at designing the hardware and the middleware, but for god's sake don't let them anywhere near GUI design if you value your sanity. |
|
|
|
Jan 25 2005, 09:11 AM
Post
#9
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,821 Joined: 13-September 04 From: Wasilla Ak. Member No.: 4,572 |
I remember the os2 interface quite well hehe. no argument there. I meant hardware tweaks, like more ram, some more ways to connect to the gadget, like a usb host. What I was thinking was that if such a device was built, it would encourage development, and so encourage an evolution of handheld functionality..... OZ and Qtopia and existing, nice, projects --and maybe "real" debian?could be slapped on board with relative ease, along with the latest kernels . It seems like an alltogether good situation, assuming all the hardware specs and driver info were readily available. (and the device got built)
|
|
|
|
Jan 26 2005, 11:38 AM
Post
#10
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 699 Joined: 26-February 04 From: near Munich, Germany Member No.: 2,043 |
QUOTE(ev1l @ Jan 23 2005, 03:54 PM) QUOTE(acpkendo @ Jan 20 2005, 03:42 PM) Could be this little beauty? As it was explained, it was a reference design, and no one that I know of picked it up. They didn't see the integration coming, and now the design is seriously missing communication features. And... it is based on the PowerPC 405LP processor. IBM has sold the 4xx line of processors to AMCC last year - and AFAIK there is currently no 405LP available. So I would assume that it is a blueprint that ended in the trash... I would have loved to compile Darwin and port the mySTEP libraries to it so that even MacOS X binaries would run... -- hns |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 12:49 PM |