![]() ![]() |
Sep 2 2004, 11:21 AM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 2-September 04 From: Ithaca, NY Member No.: 4,443 |
Alright, I've been trying to do this on my own, but it's been at least 5 days and I'm basically just going in circles.
My zaurus is a SL-5000D running OpenZaurus 3.2. My computer is running gentoo with kernel version 2.6.7. I've tried various combinations of instructions from docs and forums all over the place (From OZ, ethernet over usb. ppp over usb, even other threads from this forum) and I'm still at the exact place I started. No matter what I seem to do, or how many kernel configuration permutations I seem to try, I still cannot ping the zaurus: CODE root@minips1 /usr/src/linux # ping 192.168.129.201 PING 192.168.129.201 (192.168.129.201) 56(84) bytes of data. From 192.168.129.1 icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.129.1 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.129.1 icmp_seq=3 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.129.1 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.129.1 icmp_seq=5 Destination Host Unreachable From 192.168.129.1 icmp_seq=6 Destination Host Unreachable --- 192.168.129.201 ping statistics --- 7 packets transmitted, 0 received, +6 errors, 100% packet loss, time 6000ms , pipe 4 I plug in the zaurus, and see the following in my syslog: CODE Sep 2 14:04:01 localhost kernel: usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using address 2 at which point hotplug sets up my usb0 network.Sep 2 14:04:01 localhost kernel: usb0: register usbnet at usb-0000:00:1d.1-1, Sharp Zaurus SL-5x00 Sep 2 14:04:01 localhost kernel: usbcore: registered new driver usbnet CODE root@minips1 /usr/src/linux # lsmod Module Size Used by wlan_wep 6144 1 usbnet 13192 0 ath_pci 55716 0 wlan 105472 3 wlan_wep,ath_pci ath_hal 125008 2 ath_pci ehci_hcd 26436 0 uhci_hcd 29136 0 I have the following line in my /etc/conf.d/net file: CODE iface_usb0="192.168.129.1 pointopoint 192.168.129.201 netmask 255.255.255.0" (I have also tried 192.168.129.200, instead of 192.168.129.1, with the same results) which appears to be working as the output of the below commands shows:CODE root@minips1 /home/tekniklr # ifconfig usb0 usb0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr E6:3D:50:73:2F:0E inet addr:192.168.129.1 Bcast:192.168.129.255 Mask:255.255.255.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:80828 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:6 errors:12 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 b) TX bytes:276 (276.0 b) root@minips1 /home/tekniklr # route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.129.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 usb0 10.0.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ath0 loopback localhost.local 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 lo default 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ath0 If've also tried this, which doesn't give me better results: CODE root@minips1 /home/tekniklr # route add -host 192.168.129.201 usb0 root@minips1 /home/tekniklr # route Kernel IP routing table Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric Ref Use Iface 192.168.129.201 * 255.255.255.255 UH 0 0 0 usb0 192.168.129.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 usb0 10.0.0.0 * 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 ath0 loopback localhost.local 255.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 lo default 10.0.0.1 0.0.0.0 UG 0 0 0 ath0 My kernel has the following relevant configuration: CODE Device Drivers ---> (one of the many tutorials I looked at said PPP was needed).USB support ---> [*] Enfore USB bandiwdth allocation <M> EHCI HCD (USB 2.0) support <M> UHCI HCD (most Intel and VIA) support <M> Multi-purpose USB Networking Framework [*] Embedded ARM Linux links (iPaq, ...) [*] Sharp Zaurus (stock ROMs) [*] CDC Ethernet support (smart deviced such as cable modems) USB Gadget Support ---> <*> Support for USB Gadgets <*> USB Gadget Drivers (Ethernet Gadget) ---> Networking support ---> <*> PPP (point-to-point protocol) support <*> PPP support for sync tty ports <*> PPP Deflate compression <*> PPP BSD-Compress compression On the zaurus side, Ive verified that usbd0 is up and running with IP 198.168.129.201, and that it is accepting sync connections from '192.168.129.0/24 (default)' (though I've also tried 'All'). I've tried running CODE # route add default gw 192.168.129.1 (same results whether I'm trying to use 192.168.129.1 or 192.168.129.200 on my computer).SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable Anyway, I've recompiled my kernel no less than 15 times already, just trying whatever different things I can think of, and am now completely at a loss. I don't know if I missed a step or what, but I've gone over everything so much that I don't think I'd be able to find the problem myself anyway. Any ideas? Please? |
|
|
|
Sep 2 2004, 12:16 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 4,515 Joined: 25-October 03 From: Bath, UK Member No.: 464 |
Try posting to the openzaurus-users mailing list (link on the openzaurus.org contacts page). It's probably also worth sitting on #openzaurus on irc to see whether anyone there has any ideas.
I presume you've seen the earlier posts on this site about getting connectivity to work with 2.6.x kernels?: http://www.oesf.org/forums/inde...wtopic=4544&hl= I've just upgraded my linux box to 2.6.x so I shall also be looking at how this stuff works (tomorrow). What fun ;-) Si |
|
|
|
Sep 2 2004, 01:24 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2 Joined: 2-September 04 From: Ithaca, NY Member No.: 4,443 |
QUOTE(lardman @ Sep 2 2004, 08:16 PM) I presume you've seen the earlier posts on this site about getting connectivity to work with 2.6.x kernels?: http://www.oesf.org/forums/inde...wtopic=4544&hl= Yeah, from that and other sources I've seen, it looks everything should just work with the kernel config I have in 2.6.x.... but it's not. I'll try posting this o that mailing list, though I'm beginning to worry it's a lost cause. |
|
|
|
Sep 15 2004, 12:47 PM
Post
#4
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 33 Joined: 11-September 04 Member No.: 4,550 |
http://www.linux-migration.org/ch05s08s02.html
this worked for me with 2.6.8 |
|
|
|
Oct 5 2004, 05:22 AM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 221 Joined: 19-March 04 Member No.: 2,411 |
i had the same situation untill i turned off my firewall... Not a good solution, but at l(e)ast it works...
|
|
|
|
Oct 5 2004, 05:55 AM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 102 Joined: 7-September 04 From: UK Member No.: 4,489 |
QUOTE(tekniklr) I have the following line in my /etc/conf.d/net file: CODE iface_usb0="192.168.129.1 pointopoint 192.168.129.201 netmask 255.255.255.0" I doubt this would be the cause of all your problems, and I don't even know if this is right, but.... Should pointopoint actually read pointtopoint? (I'm only pointing this out as it jumped off the page at me for some reason) |
|
|
|
Oct 5 2004, 07:58 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 242 Joined: 31-March 04 Member No.: 2,592 |
QUOTE # route add default gw 192.168.129.1 SIOCADDRT: Network is unreachable (same results whether I'm trying to use 192.168.129.1 or 192.168.129.200 on my computer). This doesn't look like a good sign. If route refuses to add the route, that usually means that the interface really isn't up (or it doesn't have the correct subnet). Perhaps you could tell us what "ifconfig -a" reports on the Zaurus. Have you considered using something other than the USB for connectivity? I use WLAN at home between my Linux desktop, and the Zaurus and it works great! I hope this helps, Craig... |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 08:39 PM |