 Jffs 2 -> 3, Anyone already tested JFFS3? |
  |
 Jun 24 2005, 05:58 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 18 Joined: 23-June 05 Member No.: 7,421  |
JFFS3 adresses many problems observed with JFFS2, see here:
http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/tech/JF...sign/node2.html JFFS3 at: http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/ source available via cvs or snapshot - someone give/gave it a test? - NAND vs. NOR: http://www.linux-mtd.infradead.org/doc/nand.html Improvements to JFFS2: http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/jffs2/mount.php http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/jffs2/bbc.php Comparisons of Filesystems: http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/4678 |
 |
 
|
|
Jun 24 2005, 01:34 PM
Post
#2
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 1,497 Joined: 12-November 03 From: Germany Member No.: 907 |
Yes, jffs3 is a very interesting improvement, however note that it will take a lot of months until you can attempt to use it in a production system. Note also that it will never support 2.4 kernels.
|
|
|
|
|
Jun 25 2005, 02:00 PM
Post
#3
|
|
 Group: Members Posts: 696 Joined: 17-January 04 Member No.: 1,468 |
I can't believe they are removing compression in jffs3. That's very disappointing. 1-2 gig just isn't that much anymore.
I wish someone would develop a read/write filesystem with compression that works well on CF and SD cards. |
|
|
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 10:17 AM |