OESF | ELSI | pdaXrom | OpenZaurus | Zaurus Themes | Community Links | Ibiblio

IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> TKC warning
Stubear
post Jul 28 2004, 08:19 AM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 1,164
Joined: 17-December 03
From: Melbourne, AUSTRALIA
Member No.: 1,219



If you are using Cacko rom and considering purchasing TKC apps then this might be of value to you.

QUOTE
From: Shawn Gordon <shawn@thekompany.com>
To: tkc@mail.thekompany.com
Reply-To: tkc@mail.thekompany.com
Subject: RE: [Tkc] tkcRom?
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:19:51 -0700
Sender: tkc-bounces@mail.thekompany.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0

If you use Cacko's rom, we cannot support our apps on it and Cacko has been
breaking compatibility - just a caution.

At 04:45 AM 7/28/2004, you wrote:
>In the true spirit of Open Source, I would recommend moving on up to
>Cacko's latest ROM. I used Cacko at first, then Proto's ROM. I really
>liked Proto's. Cacko has taken most of what was good in that ROM and put
>it in his latest one.
>
>The only thing missing is all of Proto's cool icons. Cacko uses some of
>them, but not all. I've put a lot of them back. If I had time I'd
>probably build a "Proto ROM" theme to lay over the Cacko ROM.
>
>Christen


This is an email in response to a suggestion to use Cako rom as TKC rom's developer is missing in action
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ScottYelich
post Jul 29 2004, 12:27 PM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 992
Joined: 9-October 03
From: NYC
Member No.: 609



/me checks he calendar ...

didn't we have this discussio already?

Scott
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
maslovsky
post Jul 29 2004, 02:28 PM
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 1,426
Joined: 22-October 03
Member No.: 89



QUOTE(Stubear @ Jul 28 2004, 07:19 PM)
If you are using Cacko rom and considering purchasing TKC apps then this might be of value to you.

QUOTE
From: Shawn Gordon <shawn@thekompany.com>
To: tkc@mail.thekompany.com
Reply-To: tkc@mail.thekompany.com
Subject: RE: [Tkc] tkcRom?
Date: Wed, 28 Jul 2004 07:19:51 -0700
Sender: tkc-bounces@mail.thekompany.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0

If you use Cacko's rom, we cannot support our apps on it and Cacko has been
breaking compatibility - just a caution.

At 04:45 AM 7/28/2004, you wrote:
>In the true spirit of Open Source, I would recommend moving on up to
>Cacko's latest ROM. I used Cacko at first, then Proto's ROM. I really
>liked Proto's. Cacko has taken most of what was good in that ROM and put
>it in his latest one.
>
>The only thing missing is all of Proto's cool icons. Cacko uses some of
>them, but not all. I've put a lot of them back. If I had time I'd
>probably build a "Proto ROM" theme to lay over the Cacko ROM.
>
>Christen


This is an email in response to a suggestion to use Cako rom as TKC rom's developer is missing in action

Sash and I don't want TKC to have their hands on the ROM we're supporting. Period.

People, who has been with the Zaurus community for a while, know the reason.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
slocaus
post Jul 29 2004, 10:17 PM
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 243
Joined: 16-December 03
From: San Luis Obispo, Ca, USA
Member No.: 1,205



Even better are the posts in the last couple days about people stating that they would pay for the tkcROM development, and Shawn Gordon's response:
QUOTE
Subject: Re: [Tkc] tkcRom?
From: Shawn Gordon <shawn@thekompany.com>
To: tkc@mail.thekompany.com
Reply-To: tkc@mail.thekompany.com
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 12:29:01 -0700
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.3.0

At 12:20 PM 7/29/2004, you wrote:
>Herbert Schwappacher wrote:
>
>>I second that!!
>>
>>
>Put me down on the petition !

please, this isn't helpful.  If you honestly want to see continued
development and an update, then we would need to have $5,000 raised to
finance the development and support of it.  We would be more than happy to
then pick it up and give it a priority.

Five fricking grand!!!
I love you guys that are developing stuff here......
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
maslovsky
post Jul 30 2004, 11:31 AM
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 1,426
Joined: 22-October 03
Member No.: 89



Yes, and note that they did almost nothing except for labeling a ROM... That is some expensive label smile.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 20th December 2014 - 07:50 AM