![]() ![]() |
Sep 28 2006, 11:07 PM
Post
#1
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,376 Joined: 11-January 04 From: Poznań, Poland Member No.: 1,413 |
For nearly year we used ewi546.ewi.utwente.nl as our primary mirror and also as build machine. In next 1-2 weeks machine will get cleaned and moved to other tasks.
I want to thanks Koen Kooi for providing disk space there so we were able to provide feeds and images for our users. Without CPU power of that machine I would not be able to provide OpenZaurus 3.5.4.1/3.5.4.2-rc so easily (my home machine is not reliable enough to do builds). Now we have to think about new home for our releases. Thanks to Matthias 'CoreDump' Hentges we have it mirrored and available under adress http://feeds.openzaurus.org/ (thx goes to Chris 'kergoth' Larson for providing that CNAME). But when we release new version bandwidth usage is very big - for example OpenZaurus 3.5.4.1 took about 14GB in first days after release. We have to think how to solve it as we do not have mirrors without transfer limits now. One of solutions is moving OpenZaurus to LinuxToGo but it would need getting new machine to LTG project so we have to collect money. That will also mean moving website from SourceForge so it will work faster. Any thoughts/commments/suggestions? |
|
|
|
Sep 29 2006, 10:31 PM
Post
#2
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,565 Joined: 7-April 05 From: Sydney, Australia Member No.: 6,806 |
i am prepared to offer cpu cycles to OE as well as hard drive space
currentlly i am using a dual core amd chip (2Ghz x2) with 4GB of RAM and 2 x 200GB (raid 0, about 60MB/s transfer rate, i rely on ram to cache) of hard drive space on LVM, so setting somthing up wouldnt be too hard. the only thing i am worried about is that it is a home machine on ADSL, so i wouldnt want to serve content, only provide cpu cycles any idea how much data is pulled down when builhing the tree? |
|
|
|
Sep 30 2006, 01:12 PM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 47 Joined: 21-May 05 From: central Ohio, USA Member No.: 7,177 |
How much disk space do you need? I've got a lot, but it's spread out over a few machines. Fortunately, two of those machines are always on and one could be set up to be.
CODE Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hdc1 37G 3.4G 34G 10% / devshm 372M 12K 372M 1% /dev/shm /dev/sda1 112G 82G 31G 73% /home Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/Debian-lvol0 71G 13G 55G 19% / tmpfs 498M 0 498M 0% /lib/init/rw udev 10M 68K 10M 1% /dev tmpfs 498M 0 498M 0% /dev/shm df: `/dev/.static/dev': Permission denied /dev/sda1 236M 15M 209M 7% /boot Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda1 152G 30G 122G 20% / udev 237M 44K 237M 1% /dev devshm 237M 0 237M 0% /dev/shm The last machine is a MythTV box, so disk space can vary a bit, but most of the time it's fairly constant due to episodes expiring. CPU cycles--I could set up a distcc network here and offer it for use. It would consist of: - AMD Athlon XP 3000+ (2.16 GHz) - Intel Core 2 Duo E6300 (2x1.86 GHz) - Intel Celeron (2.1 GHz) And depending on what time zone a developer is in it's entirely possible that that developer could have the machines entirely to themselves. I'm in GMT-5 (well, GMT-4 currently with DST) and I go to bed around 10:30 PM. Bandwidth: Unfortunately I have 512 Kbps up on a consumer cable connection--consumer broadband ISPs in the US are known for being a bit, ahem, touchy about bandwidth usage despite the constant marketing barrage about "unlimited" connections. So hosting isn't an option. |
|
|
|
Sep 30 2006, 10:01 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,565 Joined: 7-April 05 From: Sydney, Australia Member No.: 6,806 |
i have 1.5mbps down and 512 up with 40G on the downloads only and supposidly unlimited on the up but i dont want to test my ISP
|
|
|
|
Oct 1 2006, 07:19 PM
Post
#5
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 81 Joined: 15-March 05 Member No.: 6,635 |
1. I strongly suggest http://www.linuxtogo.org/ as the better option.
What will Kernel Concepts exactly provide for the OZ team (I think they do mostly Nokia 770)? In any case, I can donate $50 now for a new machine, and about $20 each month to keep an OZ host running. I suggest you post a poll and setup a donation scheme to run for at least a week before committing to a decision. 2. Have you checked out with ibiblio.org and/or other space/bandwidth open-source donators? 3. If both of the above does not work, however, I can offer using my home server and ADSL as primary mirror and build: * 1.5M/768K low-latency, no limit ADSL + 4 fixed IPs * 2xOpteron 844 K8T + 2GB reg. RAM * a new 300GB IDE disk just for OZ stuff It runs SuSE 10.1 on a 2x10K rpm SATA RAID0 config and is always online. It is used, however, for a couple of other development and entertainment tasks, so performance may slightly fluctuate. It seems like there is enough "home power" for the development/build on this thread. For the content serving an option would be to mirror it on several machines and to redirect based on geographical location (IP). Still, as I said in the beginning, getting professional hosting and building is far superior, and I would suggest trying it first. |
|
|
|
Oct 1 2006, 09:18 PM
Post
#6
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 149 Joined: 17-April 04 Member No.: 2,879 |
The Linux Mirror Project or LinuxTracker might be able to handle most of the surge of new releases, leaving the others above to handle the day to day volume. This would work to the extent that people could use a torrent client.
|
|
|
|
Oct 2 2006, 12:33 AM
Post
#7
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 237 Joined: 28-December 05 Member No.: 8,801 |
Im looking into it, we have 3-4 new server donations in Hel.L.U.G (I think dual xeon with Gbit line from hol.gr internet provider)
Tasos |
|
|
|
Oct 2 2006, 01:26 PM
Post
#8
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,277 Joined: 29-July 04 From: Cambridge, England Member No.: 4,149 |
I find geekhosting to be pretty solid, and price quite reasonable.
|
|
|
|
Oct 8 2006, 03:19 AM
Post
#9
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 682 Joined: 12-February 05 From: Valencia Member No.: 6,460 |
I can contribute with a server with limited monthly transfer. On OpenZaurus release I can add some of the image files to help a bit.
|
|
|
|
Oct 9 2006, 02:54 AM
Post
#10
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,277 Joined: 29-July 04 From: Cambridge, England Member No.: 4,149 |
have you considered using Google's storage facilities?
http://code.google.com/hosting/ might be worthwhile for the large static files? This post has been edited by speculatrix: Oct 9 2006, 02:56 AM |
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 07:11 PM
Post
#11
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 156 Joined: 29-March 05 From: Virginia Member No.: 6,736 |
QUOTE(Da_Blitz @ Sep 30 2006, 02:31 AM) i am prepared to offer cpu cycles to OE as well as hard drive space currentlly i am using a dual core amd chip (2Ghz x2) with 4GB of RAM and 2 x 200GB (raid 0, about 60MB/s transfer rate, i rely on ram to cache) of hard drive space on LVM, so setting somthing up wouldnt be too hard. the only thing i am worried about is that it is a home machine on ADSL, so i wouldnt want to serve content, only provide cpu cycles any idea how much data is pulled down when builhing the tree? Would it be possible (or even worth it) to set up a distributed build environment for those of us who want to donate CPU cycles? Something between distributed.net or folding@home and a Mosix cluster? Or even something similar to ElectricSheep's render farm? I don't have any high end machines (My two fastest ones are a 2GHz Pentium-M laptop and a 1.5GHz Athlon XP 1800), but I do have several machines at home (10 or so) and I do have at least 3 dual processors. (2 PIII/966 and an UltraSparc). I would be willing to donate cycles if it was possible. |
|
|
|
Oct 17 2006, 11:13 PM
Post
#12
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,565 Joined: 7-April 05 From: Sydney, Australia Member No.: 6,806 |
looking into masix bandwidth would be the killer (i just finished an evaluation of it) the best thing for out situation would most likly be distc however by the time the job has transfered your SOL because a local compile would be quicker not to mention keeping toolchains in sync)
looking at the problem though we can see thatwe can paralize the build at the package level (taking into acount dependincies). perhaps we can whip up a deamon that builds only a specified list of packages and distribute part of the tree to each user? i can see a bash script to de it forming in my head but to me this isreally more of a python job as it would be an internet facing service (even if it only contacts a central server for instructions) man i would love to get one of the new ultrasparc machines |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 12:12 AM
Post
#13
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,014 Joined: 4-January 05 From: Enschede, The Netherlands Member No.: 6,107 |
Or you just use the tools already present, like the multithreaded bitbake and the icecc bbclass.
|
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 05:09 AM
Post
#14
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 1,376 Joined: 11-January 04 From: Poznań, Poland Member No.: 1,413 |
Thx guys for offers.
I want to write few things: Mirrors... I contacted CoreDump recently and he told that we have enough mirrors already (he is mirroring maintainer). Build machines: I recently got access to some boxes and ewi is working still so I can work without problems (and my home machine will move to amd64 in next months). During OEDEM (OpenEmbedded Developers European Meeting) we discussed about handling mirror/buildpower donations and will provide kind of information soon. |
|
|
|
Oct 18 2006, 06:07 AM
Post
#15
|
|
![]() Group: Admin Posts: 3,277 Joined: 29-July 04 From: Cambridge, England Member No.: 4,149 |
there's a *possibility* that I might be able to find an old server and set up a, ahem, free colocate here at work; we've got 16Mbps of bandwidth on bgp failover, I don't know if that would help as a fileserver and build box?
|
|
|
|
![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 08:54 AM |