OESF | ELSI | pdaXrom | OpenZaurus | Zaurus Themes | Community Links | Ibiblio

IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Sdl Benchmarking, "bvdd" slower than "qtopia" ?
josh
post Oct 24 2006, 05:42 AM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 5
Joined: 22-June 04
Member No.: 3,786



On my C1000 I have Cacko 1.23 and libsdl-1.2.5-bvdd-07-2 (piro).

SDL stuff always seemed quite slow to me.

Now I did a comparison between this, a pure Qtopia-SDL on the C1000, and the W100-SDL (piro) on my C760.

"testpalette" from the libsdl source showed these results:

CODE
C1000 bvdd:   ~7 frames/second
C1000 qtopia: ~9 frames/second
C760  w100:  ~14 frames/second

???

I suppose I'm doing something wrong. My Japanese may be a little rusty tongue.gif or my environment wants some variables ...

Or is it really a driver thing?

What are YOU getting from your SDL ?

For your convenience I attached the testpalette files for ARM.
Attached File(s)
Attached File  testpalette.zip ( 8.42K ) Number of downloads: 22
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
2 User(s) are reading this topic (2 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd August 2014 - 07:38 PM