May 16 2005, 10:12 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 577 Joined: 17-March 04 Member No.: 2,365 |
Hello
Several members have asked me to ban/remove muesli posts for trolling/not respecting the topic. Is everyone here ok with that? If you are, I'll post a final reply then remove them. Thanks, Guylhem |
|
|
|
![]() |
May 16 2005, 06:09 PM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Admin Posts: 1,418 Joined: 18-May 03 From: St. Paul, MN Member No.: 4 |
QUOTE(guylhem @ May 16 2005, 10:12 AM) Hello Several members have asked me to ban/remove muesli posts for trolling/not respecting the topic. Is everyone here ok with that? If you are, I'll post a final reply then remove them. Thanks, Guylhem I'm not OK with it. Sorry, I would have responded sooner but I was in interviews all day Anyway, meusli321 has obviously said some inflammatory things which are quite possibly completely unfounded. He shouldn't have hijacked your guylhem rom thread, which is why I split his posts and the various responses into a seperate thread. I would really prefer to not delete posts unless they are *really* bad, or spam or something. For example, if someone posted "offroadgeek is a totaly fucking idiot" is bad (wait, that's partially true |
|
|
|
May 16 2005, 07:06 PM
Post
#3
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 274 Joined: 17-October 04 Member No.: 5,063 |
QUOTE(offroadgeek @ May 16 2005, 04:09 PM) Anyway, meusli321 has obviously said some inflammatory things which are quite possibly completely unfounded. He shouldn't have hijacked your guylhem rom thread, which is why I split his posts and the various responses into a seperate thread. Thank you for moving his posts. |
|
|
|
May 16 2005, 09:33 PM
Post
#4
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,821 Joined: 13-September 04 From: Wasilla Ak. Member No.: 4,572 |
moving them is fine by me, I guess. I think his intent was malicious and his assertions false. I'm not sure that this can be conclusively demonstrated, nor am I sure that such demostration is worth persuing. His assertions seem to have been false. his intent might be harder to establish. At any rate, since his right to speech not demonstrated to have been libelous must also be protected, it is probably the easiest (and since the whole thing isn't worth much touble) best solution.
|
|
|
|
guylhem Removing Muesli Posts? May 16 2005, 10:12 AM
ken Please do. In fact, if you could ban him from pos... May 16 2005, 03:57 PM
hbo QUOTE(offroadgeek @ May 16 2005, 06:09 PM)...... May 16 2005, 06:22 PM
gfdsa IMO, his main post with 1,2,3 and your, guylhem re... May 17 2005, 12:26 AM
guylhem Well I'd like to, I don't know how to. May 17 2005, 04:51 AM
offroadgeek QUOTE(guylhem @ May 17 2005, 04:51 AM)Well I... May 17 2005, 05:21 AM
raduga QUOTE(guylhem @ May 16 2005, 10:12 AM)Several... May 17 2005, 10:34 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 23rd May 2013 - 03:14 AM |