OESF | ELSI | pdaXrom | OpenZaurus | Zaurus Themes | Community Links | Ibiblio

IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Removing Muesli Posts?
guylhem
post May 16 2005, 10:12 AM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 577
Joined: 17-March 04
Member No.: 2,365



Hello

Several members have asked me to ban/remove muesli posts for trolling/not respecting the topic. Is everyone here ok with that?

If you are, I'll post a final reply then remove them.

Thanks,
Guylhem
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
offroadgeek
post May 16 2005, 06:09 PM
Post #2





Group: Admin
Posts: 1,418
Joined: 18-May 03
From: St. Paul, MN
Member No.: 4



QUOTE(guylhem @ May 16 2005, 10:12 AM)
Hello

Several members have asked me to ban/remove muesli posts for trolling/not respecting the topic. Is everyone here ok with that?

If you are, I'll post a final reply then remove them.

Thanks,
Guylhem
*


I'm not OK with it. Sorry, I would have responded sooner but I was in interviews all day smile.gif

Anyway, meusli321 has obviously said some inflammatory things which are quite possibly completely unfounded. He shouldn't have hijacked your guylhem rom thread, which is why I split his posts and the various responses into a seperate thread.

I would really prefer to not delete posts unless they are *really* bad, or spam or something. For example, if someone posted "offroadgeek is a totaly fucking idiot" is bad (wait, that's partially true wink.gif )
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ken
post May 16 2005, 07:06 PM
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 274
Joined: 17-October 04
Member No.: 5,063



QUOTE(offroadgeek @ May 16 2005, 04:09 PM)
Anyway, meusli321 has obviously said some inflammatory things which are quite possibly completely unfounded.  He shouldn't have hijacked your guylhem rom thread, which is why I split his posts and the various responses into a seperate thread.

*


Thank you for moving his posts.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
adf
post May 16 2005, 09:33 PM
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 2,821
Joined: 13-September 04
From: Wasilla Ak.
Member No.: 4,572



moving them is fine by me, I guess. I think his intent was malicious and his assertions false. I'm not sure that this can be conclusively demonstrated, nor am I sure that such demostration is worth persuing. His assertions seem to have been false. his intent might be harder to establish. At any rate, since his right to speech not demonstrated to have been libelous must also be protected, it is probably the easiest (and since the whole thing isn't worth much touble) best solution.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th November 2014 - 12:16 AM