 Sdl Benchmarking, "bvdd" slower than "qtopia" ? |
  |
 Oct 24 2006, 05:42 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 5 Joined: 22-June 04 Member No.: 3,786  |
On my C1000 I have Cacko 1.23 and libsdl-1.2.5-bvdd-07-2 (piro).
SDL stuff always seemed quite slow to me. Now I did a comparison between this, a pure Qtopia-SDL on the C1000, and the W100-SDL (piro) on my C760. "testpalette" from the libsdl source showed these results: CODE C1000 bvdd: ~7 frames/second C1000 qtopia: ~9 frames/second C760 w100: ~14 frames/second ??? I suppose I'm doing something wrong. My Japanese may be a little rusty  or my environment wants some variables ...Or is it really a driver thing? What are YOU getting from your SDL ? For your convenience I attached the testpalette files for ARM.
Attached File(s)
|
 |
 
|
|
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th May 2013 - 09:26 PM |