OESF | ELSI | pdaXrom | OpenZaurus | Zaurus Themes | Community Links | Ibiblio

IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Apm On Current Kernel
louigi600
post Aug 31 2007, 12:08 AM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 474
Joined: 21-May 06
Member No.: 9,928



I'm not sure if this is also the the case on 2.6.21 or 2.6.22 kernels but this is what I discovered while on vacation:

When the power button is pressed for a suspend/resume apm script is not executed so all the stuff in /etc/apm is ignored in such cases (I think the whole suspend/resume affair is handled by the kernel directly when the power button is pressed) .... different story when "apm --suspend" is called.
It would be nice to be able to make the Z still do something upon suspend/resome.

The power saving stuff that should take place when the external power is or is not present is handled totally by by the lightnpower.py python sript ... and pnly works inside X since ti is the window manager that regularly executes the script . Amsolutely nothing happens when the external power status changes if you are not running X.
Presonally I think this is not a good way to appproach the problem: I would prefer having a daemon monitoring /proc/apm and react by calling a shell script tnat can then be easily modified (by anyone even without python knowlege) to make custom actions (like the acpi daemon does for standard x86 linux).

I already have a script that does more or less the same sort of things that lightnpower.py does (exept modify the config file for the moment). The problem is that the window manager has lightnpower.py hard coded in it ... should we make a plan to change this ?

P.S. :I think that the lightnpower.py script has a bug in the way that dpms features are used when suspend is inhibited (it turns off alltogether dpms ... but then standby dpms features might not behave exactly as wanted).
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
InSearchOf
post Aug 31 2007, 11:28 AM
Post #2





Group: Admin
Posts: 1,210
Joined: 20-January 06
From: York, Pennsylvania
Member No.: 8,961



I agree a background daemon would make sence :-)
But right now, I dont have much time for pdaXrom so thats all you brother :-)

Late
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 26th December 2014 - 08:32 PM