OESF | ELSI | pdaXrom | OpenZaurus | Zaurus Themes | Community Links | Ibiblio

IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Thinking Of Trying Angstrom, quick review?
deadite66
post Jan 25 2008, 03:11 PM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 29
Joined: 31-December 06
From: Great Yarmouth, UK
Member No.: 13,590



thinking of trying Angstrom.
any spitz owners have any opinion on the state of it atm compared to pdaXrom?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
 
Start new topic
Replies
jpmatrix
post Feb 15 2008, 02:43 AM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 1,019
Joined: 15-February 05
From: France
Member No.: 6,477



once you've angstrom working, why not give a try to debian zaurus ? wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
henrysviper
post Feb 15 2008, 04:47 AM
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 76
Joined: 4-May 04
From: Athens, Greece
Member No.: 3,136



QUOTE(jpmatrix @ Feb 15 2008, 12:43 PM) *
once you've angstrom working, why not give a try to debian zaurus ? wink.gif


Because Angstrom is more or less Debian wink.gif (with patches applied to make it more suitable for Zaurus and much better package granularity)
To use Debian armel you need Angstrom kernel, xserver, ts driver, zaurusd, keymap, tweaks already in Angstrom, etc.

Your work on bringing debian to zaurus is much appreciated, but please consider contributing some of your findings to Angstrom.

(Disclaimer: no affiliation at all with OE/Angstrom - also I don't want to start a flame war, just my humble opinion)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
jpmatrix
post Feb 15 2008, 08:57 AM
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 1,019
Joined: 15-February 05
From: France
Member No.: 6,477



QUOTE(henrysviper @ Feb 15 2008, 01:47 PM) *
QUOTE(jpmatrix @ Feb 15 2008, 12:43 PM) *
once you've angstrom working, why not give a try to debian zaurus ? wink.gif


Because Angstrom is more or less Debian wink.gif (with patches applied to make it more suitable for Zaurus and much better package granularity)
To use Debian armel you need Angstrom kernel, xserver, ts driver, zaurusd, keymap, tweaks already in Angstrom, etc.

Your work on bringing debian to zaurus is much appreciated, but please consider contributing some of your findings to Angstrom.

(Disclaimer: no affiliation at all with OE/Angstrom - also I don't want to start a flame war, just my humble opinion)


you're totally right! and you know i was an angstrom pioneer on my c3000 too! and even when i went to debian, "angstrom" has always been in my signature (in fact until yonggun thew his 2.6.24 kernel one week ago!) !
however i tried latest angstrom some weeks ago and i felt into ipk install problems i never had before when trying angstrom... i first said to myself that i had to continue because there's always an angstrom support with bugs.openembedded but i had so many problems that i resigned and went back to debian armel...

i don't think there should be a fight between debian and angstrom : both are arm eabi
it's true debian has taken some work from angstrom, specially zaurus customization, but everyone in debian forum knows about that. my initial post was just a suggestion about trying debian, not a flame at all rolleyes.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Posts in this topic


Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd October 2014 - 08:33 PM