Mar 5 2008, 01:29 AM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2,003 Joined: 16-April 04 From: the Netherlands && /dev/null Member No.: 2,882 |
SOLVED: for details see post #15 below.
=============================================== Hi, I am stilling thinking of setting up dualbooting Cacko and Debian/EABI using the sharp bootloader and kexec as described here: http://www.oesf.org/forum/index.php?showtopic=25555 Even though dualbooting Debian and PdaXii works fine, I feel like having the NAND run Cacko so that there are more varieties. The question is: the internal disk is already partitioned with one big giant partition filled by the Debian rootfs. The fact is Cacko/Sharp rom require the internal disk to be partitioned in exactly three parts with exact sizes/sectors. I cannot do this with GParted in Debian because the program can only resize in terms of MBs, not sectors. fdisk doesn't work here because repartitioning with fdisk will wipe the disk content clean. Of course there is a straightforward way: just tar up/create a back up image of the Debian rootfs, then use fdisk to repartition the disk, then put the Debian rootfs back in HDD1, and finally install Cacko and set up dualbooting using the method in that thread. Actually this is also what I may do. But many Debian Z users have already got the whole system working. This method, however simple, is clumsy and not without risks. So would it be feasible to do it the other way round: tweak Cacko/Sharp rom in such a way that it simply ignores the HDDs part. In principle it seems workable to me, because the files living in the three hdax do not seem to be critical for the system to operate. Everything important is all in the NAND flash. I have tried to play with /root/etc/rc.d/rc.rofilesys in Cacko by taking away all the instructions to mount the HDDs. But Cacko fails to boot because of something missing in the process (let me skip the details here). Has someone ever tried to do a similar thing? I would great appreciate if you could share your insights here. Thanks! This post has been edited by ZDevil: Apr 16 2008, 01:35 AM |
|
|
|
![]() |
Mar 5 2008, 02:07 AM
Post
#2
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 2,003 Joined: 16-April 04 From: the Netherlands && /dev/null Member No.: 2,882 |
That's nice! Thanks!
So it does sound workable. The question now may be: can we make use of the PW solution/script(s) and make it work for Cacko? What are these files? Any pointer? Just think of one more advantage of doing this: it is not just good for dualbooting, but also perhaps good for backing up and restoring, as the system will entirely live in one disk. |
|
|
|
Mar 5 2008, 02:30 AM
Post
#3
|
|
![]() Group: Members Posts: 2,821 Joined: 13-September 04 From: Wasilla Ak. Member No.: 4,572 |
That's nice! Thanks! So it does sound workable. The question now may be: can we make use of the PW solution/script(s) and make it work for Cacko? What are these files? Any pointer? Just think of one more advantage of doing this: it is not just good for dualbooting, but also perhaps good for backing up and restoring, as the system will entirely live in one disk. According to meanie's big pdf of zaurus lore at www.users.on.net/~hluc/myZaurus/book/zbook3k.pdf he hacked rc.rofilesys to get rid of those annoyances re hdd1 and hdd2. maybe there is a solution there? 1 biggie--do any of the sharp/cacko mail clients handle g-mail? I mention it since it seems like a big advantage is the combo of pdaishness and laptopishness would seem to indicate that quick email checks and that sort of thing should be handled by the pda style boot. Possibly the javaj based gmail mobile client could be used ith the qte stuff doesn't do it?-- not trying to hijack--just a concern for the results of getting this working' |
|
|
|
ZDevil Hdd-free Patch For Cacko Rom! Mar 5 2008, 01:29 AM
adf It has been done as a part of on old pocketworksta... Mar 5 2008, 02:02 AM
ZDevil Yes, it is always enjoyable to read Meanie's ... Mar 5 2008, 03:26 AM
adf QUOTE(ZDevil @ Mar 5 2008, 02:26 AM) Yes,... Mar 5 2008, 08:18 AM
speculatrix are you sure the partition sizes have to be correc... Mar 5 2008, 01:44 PM
matthis Size doesn't have to be correct, file partitio... Mar 5 2008, 03:40 PM
ZDevil Thanks, speculatrix and matthis. Yes, I was mistak... Mar 5 2008, 11:18 PM
speculatrix QUOTE(ZDevil @ Mar 6 2008, 07:18 AM) Has ... Mar 6 2008, 12:08 AM
adf QUOTE(speculatrix @ Mar 5 2008, 11:08 PM)... Mar 6 2008, 09:21 AM
jocasmi @Adf. I 've configured Sharpmail and opiemail ... Mar 16 2008, 03:38 PM
adf QUOTE(jocasmi @ Mar 16 2008, 03:38 PM) @A... Mar 17 2008, 10:37 PM
ZDevil How forgetful I was! This problem has been so... Mar 28 2008, 08:38 AM
ZDevil Updated to v0.2:Changed the timestamp to a truly u... Apr 16 2008, 12:12 AM
xamindar You mentioned a couple of posts up that this shoul... Jul 3 2008, 12:02 PM
Jon_J ZDevil, quick question.
Did you ever get the hard ... Dec 2 2008, 10:09 AM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 19th June 2013 - 10:04 PM |