OESF | ELSI | pdaXrom | OpenZaurus | Zaurus Themes | Community Links | Ibiblio

IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Sharp Camera Software
deluxe
post Jul 11 2008, 04:58 PM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 24-December 05
Member No.: 8,780



Can anyone email me the Sharp Camera software necessary to get the Sharp CE-AG06 Camera working with an sl-c1000 clamshell zaurus running cacko please.
http://www.amazon.com/Sharp-Zaurus-CE-AG06...4231&sr=8-5
Extensive googling hasn't turned up a working download for it so far.
Many thanks
neill1234(AT)yahoo.com remove the (AT)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
the_oak
post Jul 11 2008, 06:49 PM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 426
Joined: 10-February 04
From: Virginia, USA
Member No.: 1,794



Please someone, correct me, but as far as I know, the drivers are not compiled for the 1000's kernel (2.4.20). It is compiled for the 5500, 5600, and 6000, which all use the 2.4.18 kernel. I have tried using the 6000 ipk, without success. The software installs, but when you try to run it, it says to insert the card first. The card is already inserted, but apparently the modules don't load.

If you want to try it, here it is:
Attached File(s)
Attached File  qpe_camera_1.5.0_4_arm.ipk ( 24.01K ) Number of downloads: 5
 
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
deluxe
post Jul 12 2008, 06:52 AM
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 184
Joined: 24-December 05
Member No.: 8,780



Thanks for the software, I'll give it a try.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
koan
post Nov 27 2008, 06:53 AM
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 328
Joined: 25-February 04
From: UK
Member No.: 2,025



I used to have one of those. I wrote an application using the source from opie-camera as an example.
It worked on an SL-5500 and SL-C700. The quality from the camera was terrible!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Mickeyl
post Dec 9 2008, 03:54 PM
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 1,497
Joined: 12-November 03
From: Germany
Member No.: 907



Indeed. It was _really_ awful, but then again... some folks can do art with fewer pixels wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
lumag
post Dec 9 2008, 05:08 PM
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 17
Joined: 19-November 07
From: Russia, SPb
Member No.: 20,962



QUOTE(Mickeyl @ Dec 10 2008, 02:54 AM) *
Indeed. It was _really_ awful, but then again... some folks can do art with fewer pixels wink.gif

It's quality is awful. However it's bearable at QVGA. The design of camera is flawed from several points of view. The thing I'm trying to fight currently is interference with luminiscent lamps.

Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 6th March 2015 - 09:36 AM