I Will Pay Anyone $150 Us Just Compile Aspj Rt73 Module For Zaurus, will u compile 4 me RT73 for C1000 & kernel 2.4.20 ? Options

[Allelectrix]

Its incredible.. cant get kernel modules to download, dont know how to modify vanilla kernel code for Zaurus C1000 because no one
else knows it seems ? I hope I am wrong ?

And all I want is:

rt73.o

yes, that single kernel module compiled for kernel 2.4.20 and to be used on a Zaurus SL-C1000 and pdaxii13 OS.
just make sure the source code is from the ASPj rt73-k2wrlz source code and you use GCC 3.4.5 which is the default GCC for
pdaxii13.

Its got to be the all time easiest $150 US your ever going to make.

someone, somewhere out there knows exactly what I'm talking about and want, if thats you, come get your money ! its ready !

create for me rt73.o and its all yours !

contact me on +44 775 7627096 on my Cellular phone daylight GMT . if no reply, please leave a message I will get back to you
quickly.

please also contact me at: allelectrix2@yahoo.co.uk

your efforts to help me will be well rewarded. thanks so much !

[Capn_Fish]

I tried 5 versions of the code (the one you had, a newer version, a CVS, and some others), but the one that built had the fewest errors.

The others gave weird "couldn't parse something before this," where the code looked fine to me.

I think I know what is causing the segfault, too...I had to change a line of code that I didn't really know what it did.

If somebody's familiar with kernel stuff, I'd appreciate you looking at this line:

CODE

struct usb_device *dev = pAd->pUsb_Dev;
...
//struct device *udevice = &dev->dev;
struct device *udevice = dev;

The third, commented out one is the original. The compiler claims that there's no such member "dev" in "&dev," so I hacked it together so it compiled

Basically, if somebody could tell me what to change that to, I should have a working module. I believe that usb_device is defined in the kernel header include/linux/usb.h. I haven't worked with structs, so this all seems like a jumbel/excruciatingly messy coding to me (which it likely is).

[laan]

CODE

struct usb_device *dev = pAd->pUsb_Dev;
...
//struct device *udevice = &dev->dev;
struct device *udevice = dev;

The third, commented out one is the original. The compiler claims that there's no such member "dev" in "&dev," so I hacked it together so it compiled

The code is trying to assign udevice as a pointer to the dev member of dev struct and the compiler is complaining there is no member dev in dev struct so you need to find the definition of dev struct and find why there is no dev member.

The change you made assigned udevice as a pointer to whole dev struct which will overflow as soon as the code tries to use that pointer, if you find and post the definition of dev struct may be we can give you a hand (or maybe no )

As a stupid example the code is pointing to a book on a shelf and the compiler can not find that book while your edition in code pointed to the bookshelf itself not a single book and once compiled it brokes its back trying to pick the bookshelf .