Dec 23 2004, 02:27 PM
Post
#1
|
|
|
Group: Members Posts: 95 Joined: 7-December 03 From: Berne, Switzerland Member No.: 1,048 |
Maybe sometimes posts and polls are controversial.
I even know what, and that was the original poll's intention in the topic http://www.oesf.org/forums/inde...?showtopic=9556 - and now some nice person (supicion: a mod...) changed it to include a third option which was not planned for. I wanted to get a decision on what *existing* GUI toolset should be kept. Else, I could have started putting in other options like Cacko, Enlightenment etc as well, which wouldn't have helped. Since phpBB doesn't offer the possibility to cast weighted votes, I kept it to two options. Basically, being mod in another forum, I understand, that sometimes, moderation is needed. But I usually also post the justification why I did this and that. That's missing here. I'd like to know who's responsible for this action, and justify his/her actions, either here in public, or by PM. |
|
|
|
mussi Modification Of Polls Without Justification Dec 23 2004, 02:27 PM
offroadgeek I added the third option, because I felt it was wh... Dec 23 2004, 02:47 PM
amrein Well it's like any experience: without the neu... Dec 24 2004, 01:20 AM
mussi Exactly.
The pont of this poll was to force a dec... Dec 24 2004, 03:52 AM
ScottYelich so make two.
poll one says:
IF YOU HAD TO PICK O... Dec 24 2004, 06:42 AM
mussi The bulletin board software offer me this option? Dec 24 2004, 06:04 PM![]() ![]() |
|
Lo-Fi Version | Time is now: 18th May 2013 - 08:05 PM |