OESF | ELSI | pdaXrom | OpenZaurus | Zaurus Themes | Community Links | Ibiblio

IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

Profile
Personal Photo
Options
Options
Personal Statement
fooman doesn't have a personal statement currently.
Personal Info
fooman
Age Unknown
Gender Not Set
Location Unknown
Birthday Unknown
Interests
No Information
Statistics
Joined: 7-July 06
Profile Views: 643*
Last Seen: 16th March 2009 - 05:52 PM
Local Time: Mar 29 2015, 06:41 AM
49 posts (0 per day)
Contact Information
AIM No Information
Yahoo No Information
ICQ No Information
MSN No Information
* Profile views updated each hour

fooman

Members


Topics
Posts
Comments
Friends
My Content
17 Oct 2006
I just got a C3000. I installed Cacko C3K Beta1 on it and erased the user portion just as the instructions said. Everything works great but I'm trying to get a list of installed packages and I'm not able to. ipkg doesn't have a "list_installed" option and the GUI package manager doesn't list any installed packages. Also, I looked in /usr/lib/ipkg/info and /usr/lib/ipkg/lists and I couldn't find anything.

This is unrelated to the packages question but does anyone know how to mount /hdd3 as an ext3 filesystem? I used fdisk to delete the FAT partition in /dev/hda3 and then created a new Linux partition. Then I used mkfs.ext2 -j to format /dev/hda3 as an ext3 partition.

The root filesystem is read only so I used "mount -o remount,rw /" to make it read write and then changed /sbin/hddmount so it would mount /dev/hda3 to /hdd3 as an ext3 partition. But when I boot up, it complains that /dev/hda3 isn't a valid FAT partition. The boot sequence basically freezes so I have to hit ctrl-c to let the boot continue but obviously something isn't right here. It seems like it's still somehow executing the old /sbin/hddmount to mount a FAT partition, or maybe the command is somewhere else. /etc/rc.d/rc.rofilesys is basically empty so that's not the culprit.

Any ideas? For now, I made /dev/hda3 back into a VFAT partition so at least the Z will boot up correctly. blink.gif
21 Jul 2006
Hi,

I'm an OE newbie trying to get up to speed with bitbake. I installed bitbake, OE, and monotone according to the GettingStarted instructions in the OE wiki. I also installed the required software packages on to my Ubuntu Dapper Drake system such as python-dev, python-psyco, ccache, cvs, subversion, openjade, docbook, etc.

When I run "bitbake nano" from my /stuff/build directory, it downloads and compiles a fair number of packages: autoconf, automake, bison, flex, gettext, gnu-config, libtool, m4, and quilt.

But when it gets to binutils-cross, it complains and gives this error:

CODE
NOTE: package binutils-cross-2.17-r0: task do_compile: started
ERROR: function do_compile failed
ERROR: see log in /stuff/build/tmp/work/binutils-cross-2.17-r0/temp/log.do_compile.13773
NOTE: Task failed: /stuff/build/tmp/work/binutils-cross-2.17-r0/temp/log.do_compile.13773


This is what is contained at the end of log.do_compile.13773:

CODE
NOTE: make configure-build-libiberty all
make[1]: Entering directory `/stuff/build/tmp/work/binutils-cross-2.17-r0/binutils-2.17/build.i686-linux.INVALID-INVALID'
Configuring in ./bfd
configure: loading site script /stuff/org.openembedded.dev/site/i686-linux
configure: loading cache ./config.cache
checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking host system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu
checking target system type... Invalid configuration `INVALID-INVALID': machine
`INVALID' not recognized
configure: error: /bin/sh /stuff/build/tmp/work/binutils-cross-2.17-r0/binutils-2.17/bfd/../config.sub INVALID-INVALID failed
make[1]: *** [configure-bfd] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory `/stuff/build/tmp/work/binutils-cross-2.17-r0/binutils-2.17/build.i686-linux.INVALID-INVALID'
make: *** [all] Error 2


I noticed this command in run.do_compile.13773:

CODE
export LD_FOR_TARGET="INVALID-INVALID-ld"


is there a reason why it would produce a variable like this?

Here is my local.conf. I'm trying to compile for the 2.6 poodle kernel. I didn't install any toolchain because the instructions indicated that the toolchain would be created by bitbake.

CODE
DL_DIR="/stuff/sources"
BBFILES="/stuff/org.openembedded.dev/packages/*/*.bb"
BBMASK=""

# Select between multiple alternative providers, if more than one is eligible.
PREFERRED_PROVIDERS="virtual/qte:qte virtual/libqpe:libqpe-opie"
PREFERRED_PROVIDERS+=" virtual/libsdl:libsdl-qpe"
PREFERRED_PROVIDERS+=" virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc-initial:gcc-cross-initial"
PREFERRED_PROVIDERS+=" virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}gcc:gcc-cross"
PREFERRED_PROVIDERS+=" virtual/${TARGET_PREFIX}g++:gcc-cross"

MACHINE="poodle"
TARGET_ARCH="arm"
TARGET_OS="linux"
TARGET_FPU="soft"
DISTRO="openzaurus-unstable"
MACHINE_KERNEL_VERSION="2.6"

IMAGE_FSTYPES="jffs2 tar"
BBINCLUDELOGS="yes"

CVS_TARBALL_STASH="http://www.oesources.org/source/current/"


Any clue as to what I'm doing wrong?
Last Visitors
fooman has no visitors to display.

Comments
Other users have left no comments for fooman.

Friends
There are no friends to display.
RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 29th March 2015 - 02:41 AM