Help - Search - Members - Calendar
Full Version: Video Accel For Pxa270 Under 2.6 Here
OESF Forums > Distros, Development, and Model Specific Forums > Distro Support and Discussion > Angstrom & OpenZaurus
danboid
That's what zodttd (zpsx author) tells me

If so, is the video performance of mplayer (for example) better under OZ/GPE than mplayer under Cacko now? I would've hoped so.

Can't wait for the next OZ test if this is true! Any news on pxa270 cpu scaling under 2.6?
zodttd
Misunderstanding. It's currently implemented on the pdaXrom 2.6 kernel distro in development, not OZ.
Hrw
as ugly hacks
bam
QUOTE(Hrw @ Apr 27 2006, 12:05 PM)
as ugly hacks
*




thats really a crappy comment, and totally unprofessional
koen
QUOTE(bam @ Apr 27 2006, 08:08 PM)
QUOTE(Hrw @ Apr 27 2006, 12:05 PM)
as ugly hacks
*




thats really a crappy comment, and totally unprofessional
*



It's also very true: http://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showt...ndpost&p=124781
bam
so what? attitudes of this nature will not encourage people to try your rom more, in fact it will only put people off from tring it, I suppose you dont want new users to try out you nice distribution?
Hrw
bam: http://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showt...ndpost&p=124781

anyway I decided to stop posting ANY infos in that subject (pdax/2.6)
bam
I read it. you know what on second thought I wont even address this, I am glad however that I can separate the nice distribution from the attitudes that are sometimes presented by its creators, although I probably cant say the same for everyone.
sashz
koen, you talkin'bot, look me your nice patches. I know OZ hates pdaXrom because OZ sucks wink.gif

QUOTE(koen @ Apr 27 2006, 12:10 PM)
QUOTE(bam @ Apr 27 2006, 08:08 PM)
QUOTE(Hrw @ Apr 27 2006, 12:05 PM)
as ugly hacks
*




thats really a crappy comment, and totally unprofessional
*



It's also very true: http://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showt...ndpost&p=124781
*

koen
QUOTE(sashz @ Apr 28 2006, 10:46 AM)
koen, you talkin'bot, look me your nice patches. I know OZ hates pdaXrom because OZ sucks wink.gif
*


All my patches are in OE, for everyone to see.
Hrw
sash: what a nice comment - this part of forum is not moderated by Laze so it will stay.
sashz
Oh, I see this ugly stuff. Its even cannot crossbuild apache.

QUOTE(koen @ Apr 28 2006, 03:02 AM)
QUOTE(sashz @ Apr 28 2006, 10:46 AM)
koen, you talkin'bot, look me your nice patches. I know OZ hates pdaXrom because OZ sucks wink.gif
*


All my patches are in OE, for everyone to see.
*

Cresho
ohh com on!!! you guys are better than this!~ mad.gif
Srono
Please please stop sad.gif

No distros are perfect at the moment, right? So it is easy to spot the disadvantage of each other to argue... Actually, even a distro is very good, many users may still one to use another one because that is their *taste*. No need to "help" users to decide by your arguments. Let them decide and choose the most suitable one for them. Ok?

Ok... OZ developers may say that pdaxrom using *ugly* hacks, but do you think it is even true, many users here like that kind of hacks. For the end-users like me, the best one is the one which is most suitable for their need. I think the reason that m$ windows is popular is that people do not need to know anything inside or how it works to use the computer. *Ugly* hack or not, they dont care if it works well for them.

All of us here really appreciated your very good distributions to the community. But let the users judge your works.

Thanks !
andresgriego
QUOTE(Hrw @ Apr 27 2006, 01:05 PM)
as ugly hacks
*



Welcome to the SHITTY world of Linux.
CoreDump
QUOTE(andresgriego @ Apr 28 2006, 11:02 PM)
QUOTE(Hrw @ Apr 27 2006, 01:05 PM)
as ugly hacks
*



Welcome to the SHITTY world of Linux.
*



I take the "shitty" world of Linux over the steaming pile of crap coming out of redmond any day, thank you very much.
0xDEADBEEF
You guys need a chill pill.

Maybe you should better talk about how to make it into non-ugly hack and maybe work together on 2.6 kernel.

I don't understand all this whole pdaXrom <> OZ animosity

Now get back to work and compile me some kernel! biggrin.gif
sashz
How OZ people hate me / pdaXrom - get the facts:

They calls my patches ugly unprofessional hacks etc.. Than RP adds untested and with more ugly stuff (based on the same intel patch) inside, and that is cool - now OZ have cool nice professional path ( http://www.rpsys.net/openzaurus/patches/px...verlay-r0.patch ) !
0xDEADBEEF
Damn kids, grow up.
Instead of quarelling, work on the kernel together. Both OZ and pdaXrom would only benefit from it.
Can't we just get along?
sashz
QUOTE(0xDEADBEEF @ Apr 28 2006, 11:27 PM)
Damn kids, grow up.
Instead of quarelling, work on the kernel together. Both OZ and pdaXrom would only benefit from it.
Can't we just get along?
*


they want war - they will get it
Hrw
sash: grow up

if patch is in RP patches dir then it does not mean that it is used in OE/OZ kernel.

EOT from me

THX koen for notice about mistake
koen
QUOTE(Hrw @ Apr 29 2006, 09:32 AM)
sash: grow up

if patch is in RP patches dir then it does mean that it is used in OE/OZ kernel.

EOT from me
*


s/does/does not/
ant
Sash, Hrw, all developers,

we all know you are basically working with NO profit and we thank you, BUT...

DON'T WASTE YOUR TIME -> don't reinvent the wheel!

Sashz, you are a very skilled guy, why the heck are you loosing your time on a 2.6 kernel? There is already a "working" one needing some of your "hacks".

You'd better help RPurdie and the others patching the kernel and developing/debugging...

C'mon guys, join the forces and show us what you are able to do.
I'm confident someone (Sharp or other big Co.) would be very interested to hire a TEAM and not some hysteric programmers.

Thank you again for your work, but hurry up NOW!

Just my 2 (euro)cents...

Ant


P.S. IMHO openzaurus-gpe is moving in the right direction and could be the definitive distro when finished.
sashz
QUOTE(ant @ Apr 29 2006, 10:18 AM)
You'd better help RPurdie and the others patching the kernel and developing/debugging...


thank you, i already wanted help them, and you can look what is going then.
zodttd
Sorry about instigating anything on either side of this argument.
Hope the best for both distro's. I've booted both up and they both have advantages.

Thanks RP for giving the pxa overlay patch a go. I'll try it out when I get a chance, and once I figure out how to get it compiled in. If it ever makes it into a build of OZ, I'll get my software to support it, but it seems like there's no plan for that.

Any other user's besides danboid and I interested in having OZ support RP/Sashz patch for intel's overlay patch? It should speed up software such as my psx emulator, mplayer, and SDL apps (just a compile of a certain 1.2.9 version that supports it) considerably.

It makes little sense not to take someones offering of help. Even if it's not up to someones standards, it could be worked on further so it can be at that level of quality, right?
Da_Blitz
So now the that everythings resolved anyone care to give me a rundown of where we stand with the pxa buffer, before and after patch as well as comparison to 2.4 bvdd, i think i have finally found enough info to work out that bvdd is an overlay acsess mechanism

that got me thinking if we can do the overlay then could we use the YUV to RGB hardware conversion for a speedup in mplayer and is this what bvdd does?
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.
Invision Power Board © 2001-2014 Invision Power Services, Inc.