Capn_Fish
Oct 24 2006, 01:11 PM
What are the differences between the SL-C3200 and the SL-C3100? As far as I can tell, the only differences are:
-Bigger hard disk
-Different color
-New SD driver?
Are there any other differences (Battery life, performance, etc.)?
I didn't see a thread about this, so I hope I'm not reposting an existing topic.
Thanks!
bluedevils
Oct 24 2006, 04:16 PM
this is a well worn topic, but you've pretty much summed up the differences.
daufoo
Oct 24 2006, 04:51 PM
additional differences will be the software that comes with them.
Antikx
Oct 24 2006, 04:52 PM
Also, I think others have mentioned that there is some kind of an overclocking diference too... or is that just because software needs to be updated?
bluedevils
Oct 24 2006, 05:11 PM
I think you are correct. I do remember someone saying that the 3200 does not overclock as well as the others.
QUOTE(Antikx @ Oct 24 2006, 07:52 PM)
Also, I think others have mentioned that there is some kind of an overclocking diference too... or is that just because software needs to be updated?
Jon_J
Oct 24 2006, 08:52 PM
There's a thread here:
http://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=19016maslovsky's post, Post #11
QUOTE
The CPU in 3200 is different from C1000/C3000/C3100 - there is a different revision number. It looks like older CPU overclocks better...
BTW, where is maslovsky these days?
Haven't heard from him in quite awhile.
Capn_Fish
Oct 25 2006, 03:49 AM
I'm gathering that if I don't care about the extra disk space, I should go with the Sl-C3100?
Thanks.
bluedevils
Oct 25 2006, 05:11 AM
I presumed he got busy doing other stuff like work.
QUOTE(Jon_J @ Oct 24 2006, 11:52 PM)
BTW, where is maslovsky these days?
Haven't heard from him in quite awhile.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please
click here.