OESF Portables Forum
Everything Else => Zaurus Distro Support and Discussion => Distros, Development, and Model Specific Forums => Archived Forums => Angstrom & OpenZaurus => Topic started by: Jon_J on December 10, 2008, 12:54:51 pm
-
I want to install Dillo 2.0 on my angstrom C3100 with Angstrom version: "Angstrom-x11-image-glibc-ipk-2007.12-r13-spitz-installkit"
I cannot find it in the default official feeds for my Angstrom version, but I found it in this OZ feed:
openzaurus.org/download/3.5.4.1/feed/x11/
The problem is that the libraries listed for depends are older versions and I don't want to "mix" old libs with the default newer ones.
Can Dillo 2.0 just be installed with the "current" libs for my Angstrom version?
Dillo-from-Packages OZ Index of download-3.5.4.1-feed-x11
http://www.openzaurus.org/download/3.5.4.1/feed/x11/
Package: dillo2
Version: 0.6.6-r0
Depends: gdk-pixbuf-loader-xpm, gtk+ (>= 2.6.10), libatk-1.0-0 (>= 1.9.0), libc6 (>= 2.3.5+cvs20050627), pango (>= 1.8.1), libglib-2.0-0 (>= 2.6.4), libjpeg62 (>= 6b), libpng12-0 (>= 1.2.8), libz1 (>= 1.2.3), libgcc1 (>= 3.4.4)
Section: x11/network
Architecture: arm
Maintainer: Chris Lord
MD5Sum: bad6b6eb869e6c55ce60721ec2e351e5
Size: 124960
Filename: dillo2_0.6.6-r0_arm.ipk
Description: Lightweight gtk+2 browser.While on this subject,
Can one install older OZ application packages onto the current Angstrom version?
-
I don't know why that feed lists it as Dillo 2, as it's really not (just look at the version number).
I don't know if OE has a build file for Dillo 2, but if it does, I could build you a package (I'm already setting it up, so I might as well) and post it along with the deps.
-
I don't know why that feed lists it as Dillo 2, as it's really not (just look at the version number).
I don't know if OE has a build file for Dillo 2, but if it does, I could build you a package (I'm already setting it up, so I might as well) and post it along with the deps.
You are right, I just looked and I have a dillo2 pkg in my two year old pdaxrom/pdaxii3 archive.
The new version should read "dillo_2.0", shouldn't it?
That would be cool, I bet I'm not the only one who would like Dillo 2.0 for Angstrom.
Dillo is especially good for reading offline archived web sites.
I looked into compiling and all the related stuff last Winter, but it overwhelmed me and I just got confused, so I gave it up for awhile.
-
With Bitbake, it SHOULD just be "bitbake dillo," but there's a blocking but ATM that won't let my environment get set up. I'll get to trying it as soon as my environment can be set up.
-
Can one install older OZ application packages onto the current Angstrom version?
Almost certainly not unless there is a compatibility package available which I am not aware of.
Oliver