The package manager is the heart and soul of any Linux distro. IMHO you don't consider releasing even an early beta if the package manager isn't working. What use is an OS if the end user can't easily install and uninstall applications? Including those in the "feed" and under direct control of the distro he is using?
Hmmm...Looking at your signature information seems to somewhat minimize your argument:
SL-5500, Sharp ROM 3.13,
Windows XP Pro SP2,
Intellisync 3.2E, Outlook 2003.
Last I remember, Windows' package manager was at the mercy of the whatever programs get installed, and it is a constant fight against cruft. I'm not trying to start an OS war here, but you really need to either lend a hand or shut up. Your constant needling of the openzaurus developers is couterproductive.
And by the way, does your diatribe above mean that Slackware is not a real Linux distro?
My experience of OZ is that the graphical installer is broken and is not even capable of installing packages from the OZ feed.
There is always the command line. Whats so hard about ipkg install <package>? I have not used the gui package manager since I installed 3.5.3...Not because it is broken, but because the command line is generally quicker than a gui.
To be a credible Linux distro for the Zaurus OZ is required to support a much smaller range of hardware than a standard X86 distro. It also needs to support a much smaller range of user applications - just stable replacements for the Sharp ROM applications would be good start.
OZ + Opie fail on both counts.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=86232\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
Really? Then you object to Debian as well? Since we have tens of thousands of packages in our repository, does that mean we also fail as a credible Linux distro? Please go back to the Sharp forums.
--Storm
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=86250\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
Firstly, comments about Windows package management are completely irrelevant. Windows XP is not a Linux distro - OZ is.
Slackware does have package management. It doesn't handle dependancies but it reliably installs and removes packages - particularly those distributed as part of Slackware.
Sharp made no mistake in not including a terminal app as part of the default installation for the original Linux based Zaurus line. A graphical installer is the correct solution for this class of devices. Use of the command line should not be required for basic administrative tasks on a device with a low resolution screen and a tiny keyboard.
The OZ/Opie graphical installer is broken. Installing packages from the OZ feed via the command line is extremely unreliable and usually requires trawling through the forums for fixes for each broken package.
Given how critical power managment is to the Zaurus line and package management is to any Linux distro I am amazed that anyone is prepare to push out releases with those key features broken yet still expects to maintain any credibility.