So, when is OpenZaurus going to stop adding new kernels and featurs and make an operating system that actually works?
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=91912\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
As soon as you stop complaining and fix the bugs...
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=91918\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
My point was not that there are bugs - all programs have bugs - but that the number of bugs has increased over the past two years. This is the opposite to every other free software program I have used. What would be the point of me fixing some bugs in the current release if the next release just adds a whole bunch more?
Some projects avoid this problem by having stable and unstable branches. The gung-ho developers add features to the unstable branch, while the old hands fix the bugs and make stable releases for the public. Now, maybe OpenZaurus doesn't have enough developers to maintain two branches, but in that case there should be one branch - stable - and a new feature shouldnt be allowed into it if it causes major system instability.
I mean, two years work and this project is less usable than it was before. If you use a metric like lines of code or new features added then maybe there has been much progress, but if you use a metric like usability or number of non-dev users then there has been *negative* progress.