Using debian-arm binaries

[Meanie]

where is it ??
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157913\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

its part of my ipk-tools package

[koen]

of course the latest .deb wont work on pdaXrom since debian has moved to using glibc 2.3 while pdaXrom is using the more stable glibc 2.2.x
older debian packages prior to sarge should work fine provided you resolve all the library dependencies...
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157910\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

You are totally ignoring the hardfpa vs softvfp problem.

[ZDevil]

Yes... it seems the debian libraries are hardfpa, while what pdaX uses is softvfp. So some debian packages don't work.
Plus the debian apps run slower because they are not compiled for pdaX.
For me it is a last resort, if compilation fails.

[telemetric_au]

and some wont compile ones you start installing other hardfpa's likethe later  libc

[radiochickenwax]

Yes... it seems the debian libraries are hardfpa, while what pdaX uses is softvfp. So some debian packages don't work.
Plus the debian apps run slower because they are not compiled for pdaX.
For me it is a last resort, if compilation fails.
[div align=\"right\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

IMO, the difference in speed is not always that noticeable. The real problem (for me) is maintaining an entire operating system (debian) on top of another (pdaxrom).  ( I use the chroot method).

[a href=\"https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=16584&hl=debian&st=0]Chrooted Debian The Other Easier? Way[/url]

 It's twice the work for less than the same amount of payback as an x86 system.