Silkscreen Does Not Work Under Pdaxrom On Sl-c1000

[Meanie]

why not compile Xorg 7.2 ?
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157822\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

because we are fixing the existing stuff, not building a new X server and breaking all the other working stuff...

[Capn_Fish]

why not compile Xorg 7.2 ?
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157822\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

because we are fixing the existing stuff, not building a new X server and breaking all the other working stuff...
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157828\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Also, unless I'm mistaken, it is heavier than XFree.

[kkazakov13]

why not compile Xorg 7.2 ?
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157822\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

What you will benefit from it ? Except eating more memory? I'd prefer compiling kdrive.

[Meanie]

Hi Meanie,

I've compiled XFree with all patches included, but it's not tested yet. Please verify.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157817\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Thanks for recompilling the whole thing. However, I tried it but the patch did not have any effect. I had another look at the patch and also the entire kbd.c file and after re-evaluating what the patch does, I don't believe that it can fix the tab/caps lock issue since the lock mechanism set by xmodmap assumes that the Caps Lock and Tab keys are physically different keys, as opposed to the same physical key which represents two logical keys toggled by Fn.
At the moment, I do not have much more time to spend on this issue. I might revisit it at a later stage but not right now...

[psycoman]

why not compile Xorg 7.2 ?
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157822\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

What you will benefit from it ? Except eating more memory? I'd prefer compiling kdrive.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157837\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

this my question, but not have a good anwser, but fix all, to after put new thigs is a good choice, and xorg7.2 can compiled as kdrive not ?

[ZDevil]

I've tried the packages in Post #3 and got the screen keys working (C1000@Beta3). That's great.

But there is one (small) issue with the Calendar (XF86LaunchA) and the "Home" screen key (XF86Launch0) under Rox.

In Rox desktop, when setting keyboard shortcuts (right click desktop icon --> Edit items --> keyboard shortcut), the Calendar key is detected as "Control + XF86LaunchA) and the "Home" screen key "Control + XF86Launch0". So I cannot assign these two keys as shortcuts.T
The other keys seem to work fine.
xev also gives the correct keysym values for all keys.

What is the cause of this?

[zi99y]

I've tried the packages in Post #3 and got the screen keys working (C1000@Beta3). That's great.

But there is one (small) issue with the Calendar (XF86LaunchA) and the "Home" screen key (XF86Launch0) under Rox.

In Rox desktop, when setting keyboard shortcuts (right click desktop icon --> Edit items --> keyboard shortcut), the Calendar key is detected as "Control + XF86LaunchA) and the "Home" screen key "Control + XF86Launch0". So I cannot assign these two keys as shortcuts.T
The other keys seem to work fine.
xev also gives the correct keysym values for all keys.

What is the cause of this?
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157864\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Try the ipk's that from post #14 - these have been updated and work fine for me on the C3200

[ZDevil]

Oh, I was wrong. What I have tried are the packages in Post#14.

[radiochickenwax]

why not compile Xorg 7.2 ?
[div align=\"right\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

What you will benefit from it ? Except eating more memory? I'd prefer compiling kdrive.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157837\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

this my question, but not have a good anwser, but fix all, to after put new thigs is a good choice, and xorg7.2 can compiled as kdrive not ?
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=157855\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

My impression as per this thread
[a href=\"https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=17950&hl=transparency]https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showt...hl=transparency[/url]
is that Xorg6.9 uses less memory than xfree.
I would think that since 7.2 is even more modular than 6.9, that it might take even less memory.

By the way, as to it's heaviness,  xorg takes more ROM space, but less RAM space than xfree AFAIK.  Sorry if this is incorrect.  

I've been trying to cross-compile 6.9, from the following page:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/stable/x/xorg.html

but failing pretty consistently.  (Don't currently have my output,  but building up to attempting a native build from a 6000).

Another benefit of compiling xorg might be that fonts could be set up more like standard X fonts, since I haven't been able to get any new ".pfb" fonts working other than what comes with the xfree package.

It would probably be somewhat difficult to apply the pdaxrom patches to the 6.9 source.  Then again, maybe not.

Last I heard, both Angstrom and OpenZaurus were using xorg7.1 with "--enable-kdrive" at compile time.
https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showt...22487&hl=kdrive

https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=23402&hl=#9  (post #9)