Author Topic: How Many Kernel Branches For A Single Device (Read 7009 times)

adf · « **Reply #15 on:** March 21, 2007, 10:03:31 am »

Ah. gotcha.

Then probably the way you will be headed is something like a tetsu (fast, clockable & stable 2.4 with working modules) and an updated pdax1/3?

That could be nice, though to be slightly off topic, I'd change the default wm to xfce --better window sizing & really easy to make buttons for network profiles

Hrw · « **Reply #16 on:** May 02, 2007, 05:20:18 pm »

I do not plan to even look at 2.4-crapix kernel.

adf · « **Reply #17 on:** May 02, 2007, 08:03:41 pm »

LMAO. I meant xjqian, not you HRW. Though now that you mention it taunting OE devs with 2.4 issues might make an entertaining pastime

xjqian · « **Reply #18 on:** May 02, 2007, 09:29:45 pm »

Quote

I do not plan to even look at 2.4-crapix kernel.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=160309\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Do you think if studying sharp 2.4-crapix kernel would help to fix (or work-around) the bugs in the Angstrom 2.6 kernel (i.e. suspend/resume, screen issue (16bit write), and sled battery, etc. for Tosa)?

News:

Author Topic: How Many Kernel Branches For A Single Device (Read 7009 times)