Author Topic: Let's Try Browsex (Read 4197 times)

scoutme · « **on:** December 25, 2005, 05:59:14 am »

anyone tryng to compile browsex? should be something dillo-like, but with javascript support

ScottYelich · « **Reply #1 on:** December 25, 2005, 03:06:46 pm »

Quote

anyone tryng to compile browsex? should be something dillo-like, but with javascript support
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=108438\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

I wish they would just make dillo work!

DrWowe · « **Reply #2 on:** December 25, 2005, 03:34:18 pm »

Firefox is working perfectly here (other than being a bit of a memory hog).

It pays to go to View->Toolbars->Customize and rearrange things slightly for the small screen.
Putting the address bar on a line of its own is a good idea.

adf · « **Reply #3 on:** December 26, 2005, 04:48:18 am »

Quote

Quote
anyone tryng to compile browsex? should be something dillo-like, but with javascript support
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=108438\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

I wish they would just make dillo work!
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=108463\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

would be nice. But like firefox on my Z asa "heavy" I'd like to get a full working set of flash and java plugins, and some more codecs to work wit mplayer plugin, in fact.

But a working ssl/frames/javascript capable dillo would make a really good counterpart

scoutme · « **Reply #4 on:** December 26, 2005, 05:19:17 am »

I use firefox too... but a dillo Ã la netfront would be amazing, and would change my habits for sure. Firefox is cpu/memory ungry

gromituk · « **Reply #5 on:** December 26, 2005, 03:05:52 pm »

I do wonder if you add Javascript to Dillo it might get nearly as heavy as Firefox!

scoutme · « **Reply #6 on:** December 26, 2005, 05:47:19 pm »

I don't think so; Netfront is far faster than Firefox, even if javascript-capable. I like firefox very much, but you must remeber that Firefox is based upon Gecko, that is maybe the slower and heavier engine alive.

urielka · « **Reply #7 on:** December 28, 2005, 03:39:32 am »

if you use Konqueror in full kde desktop it run very fast and it is not such a memory hog as firefox even in non-kde desktop

Meanie · « **Reply #8 on:** December 28, 2005, 04:41:30 am »

has the firefox port for the zaurus been optimized or just compiled for biggest compatability?
there is potentially a lot of stuff that can be stripped from firefox to make it load and run faster.
not sure if i have time for that right now, but i'll take a crack at it eventually...

adf · « **Reply #9 on:** December 28, 2005, 04:09:47 pm »

Quote

if you use Konqueror in full kde desktop it run very fast and it is not such a memory hog as firefox even in non-kde desktop
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=108634\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Hmm I had been hoping to see something come of the way Kaonqueror handles java (no plugin needed... just a jvm, I think) Maybe there is hope if more people use it?

Have you beem able to use qbedic in kde or with the kde qtlibs in use?

News:

Author Topic: Let's Try Browsex (Read 4197 times)