So which is "better" opie or gpe? I know it's very subjective, but any personal opinions are useful.
Difficult one. I'm using GPE at the moment, but both are good - I think you should go on the available apps and the ease of porting.
If gpe uses kdrive and some "diet-xlibs", is it easier to port an X11 application to gpe, than opie?
There is generally no porting to be done for GPE - just cross-compile it and it works. Opie is a different matter, and has the same porting issues as Qtopia as it's framebuffer based.
And my old quietions. Will my zaurus runs out of power earlier if I use gpe or opie based openzaurus insted of original Sharprom & Qtopia?
No, the two should perform the same.
Is it possible to use both of them on same zaurus (eg. dual boot sharprom and gpe/openzaurus)?
No, I don't think so - the Sharp 'ROM' uses old libs, uses hard-float and is compild with GCC2.95.3. OZ is compiled with GCC 3.x.x, uses soft-float and is up to date on the library front.
Can I run gpe applications, or normal apps like gimp on opie?
You can run gimp on GPE that's for sure; it's also possible I understand to 'dual boot' Opie & GPE; you could run GPE/X11 based apps under Opie using XQt - this is in the OZ feed iirc. Take a look at the XQt part of the forum for more info about how to get it working though as I'm not an expert.
Si