OESF Portal | OESF Forum | OESF Wiki | LinuxPDA | #planetgemini chat on matrix.org | #gemini-pda chat on Freenode | #zaurus and #alarmz chat on Freenode | ELSI (coming soon) | Ibiblio

IPB

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

2 Pages V   1 2 >  
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Battery Useage
ThC
post Jun 18 2004, 07:52 AM
Post #1





Group: Members
Posts: 259
Joined: 12-May 04
From: France
Member No.: 3,256



I just reinstalled pdaXrom after running cacko 1.21b for a few weeks and noticed the difference in battery useage between these 2 roms ... So I was wondering how can it be that with cacko's QT based rom I can use my Z all day long and come back at home with 80% of battery left and with pdaXrom I get home with sth like 50% (havin just listened a few mp3s during transport times)
Is there any reason why pdaXrom should drain the battery faster than QT ? is this just coming from the music player applet in QT being able to shut off the screen on demand while pdaX shuts it off after 20secs (my settings) ?
Are these 20secs enough to drain ~10% of my battery life each time I switch the diplay on and off ? another thing is ... while using the pda and listening music under pdaXrom i can see the battery gauge going down at , like 1% per minute while under cacko's QT rom it will lose 1% every 10 minutes or so ...
anyone have an idea about it ?
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
alan
post Jun 20 2004, 12:02 PM
Post #2





Group: Members
Posts: 221
Joined: 19-March 04
Member No.: 2,411



dear Thc,

I've been using pdaxrom 1.0.5 for weeks now, so i don't know about QT rom but as far as i am concerned, i can use abiword for about 5 hours with minimum screen light (it's a better power life than many laptops...). I think it is quite a high poxer consuming activity so i guess your pb may come from your music player.

Plus, i noticed (i'm not the only one) that mp3 playing gets the Z on it's knees. Maybe the pdaxrom team should check there code and see if there is no possible improvement. (I wish i knew how to help them, but i don't...)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
padishah_emperor
post Jun 24 2004, 09:02 AM
Post #3





Group: Members
Posts: 849
Joined: 6-March 04
Member No.: 2,180



I have also noticed this, and the lack of comment by other users or the development team. I really don't know what the issue is, but there is definately a quicker drain on the battery than on Cacko QT.

I can leave my Z plugged into the mains for 8 or more hours, the charge light stays on (it never goes off with pdaXrom) and then when unplugged the power shows up as 70-80%, this drops another 10% within a few minutes, one hour of music playing (OGG) and the power drops to 40-50%.

In order to prove to myself that my Z is not dying, I flashed the QT ROM back on, the charge light works and the battery life is far better. So it's not my machine, it's something in the way pdaXrom works, my only concern with this is that my longer term plans involve getting a microdrive, I shudder to think how quick the power will drain then!

Maybe one of the pdaXrom team can elaborate for us?
(BTW, nice work)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scoutme
post Jul 5 2004, 02:23 PM
Post #4





Group: Members
Posts: 579
Joined: 19-April 04
Member No.: 2,912



quite strange than no other noticed the battery-life problem that pdaxrom actually bears.

I personally switched bach to sharp roms (Cacko) ONLY for battery usage problems
...also for handwriting, but that was a minor issue wink.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scoutme
post Jul 5 2004, 02:26 PM
Post #5





Group: Members
Posts: 579
Joined: 19-April 04
Member No.: 2,912



I suspect pdaxrom doesn't manage Xscale variable mhz feature...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ThC
post Jul 6 2004, 01:58 AM
Post #6





Group: Members
Posts: 259
Joined: 12-May 04
From: France
Member No.: 3,256



I dont think cacko manage it either ... as cacko's rom do also have the overclocking/underclocking utility and the frequency won't move by itself ... BTW, reinstalled it recently and noticed the difference is less significant than before ... is that the same kind of problem than my pseudo dead pixels ? (having randomly dead pixels at each pdaXrom install - no dead pixels at all under cacko rom)
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scoutme
post Jul 6 2004, 03:15 AM
Post #7





Group: Members
Posts: 579
Joined: 19-April 04
Member No.: 2,912



I think that Cacko DO manage Xscale, just remember its core is the sharp rom.

The fact they let you choose the clockrate doesn't mean necessarily the os doesn't manage power consumption, although it could be possible.


Anyway, the fact is that, in a way or the other, cacko uses almost half the battery pdaxrom uses, and that's quite a heavy issue to think on sad.gif


p.s.: no dead pixels in my pdaxrom flashing
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Laze
post Jul 6 2004, 10:12 AM
Post #8





Group: Members
Posts: 704
Joined: 9-October 03
From: Denmark
Member No.: 20



We are been looking into the "power" issue - and we think the difference is due to the fact Qtopia is using the "real" AtiCore functions. ATI power manager FPGA, and we think without normal/real documentation its impossible to use.

Stupid closed source agreements, so we have no idea and ATI don't wan't to hand out the documentation and no response from Zaurus - big surprise.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scoutme
post Jul 6 2004, 11:38 AM
Post #9





Group: Members
Posts: 579
Joined: 19-April 04
Member No.: 2,912



terrible...

Can't we try to contact Ati?

We can try to convince them that releasing their cores sheets will let their product become more and more requested by manufacturers, since their pdas market will be bigger and bigger, due to opensource.


...I know, not so good arguments in THIS world sad.gif

I'll try by myself some moves
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Laze
post Jul 6 2004, 04:31 PM
Post #10





Group: Members
Posts: 704
Joined: 9-October 03
From: Denmark
Member No.: 20



Any help getting ATI or Sharp to release some source/documentation would be greatly appreciated - we have applied for developer accounts several times at ATI site..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ppfundst
post Jul 7 2004, 02:13 AM
Post #11





Group: Members
Posts: 35
Joined: 16-January 04
Member No.: 1,455



That sucks! I noticed that battery life problem too.

If I wanted to contact ATi, What would be the references of the card they use in the Zaurus? What should I ask them exactly?

Maybe we could write a petition to them!!

Patrick
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
scoutme
post Jul 7 2004, 04:57 AM
Post #12





Group: Members
Posts: 579
Joined: 19-April 04
Member No.: 2,912



I fear that a petition could be risky,,, they could feel exposed.


If they just give their sources and info to pdaXrom developers, and in a way enter in collaboration with them, maybe we'll have more possibilities.


By the way, the petition could be the solution, everything is possible-.

Other point: I read some time ago that the guy/z behind open Omega Radeon Drivers for Windows are actually in contact with Ati (maybe one of them works for Ati), and Ati says that "Omega Drivers are a good Open alternative to their drivers".
So it could be possible to create a collaboration with Ati, with some terms they maybe would like to discuss.

I think I'll try to contact the Omega guys.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ced
post Jul 7 2004, 05:14 AM
Post #13





Group: Members
Posts: 225
Joined: 9-December 03
Member No.: 1,104



I thought the pdaxrom was overclocking the ATI stuff from 75Mhz to 100Mhz, if that's the case then it could drain the battery a bit faster...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
Reaper
post Jul 7 2004, 06:51 AM
Post #14





Group: Members
Posts: 126
Joined: 13-December 03
Member No.: 1,174



Yes, this problem does exist (battery light never goes off when charging pdaX Z and it uses much more power). I think that this problem should be solved in some different ways: 1) Turning off display after ~10 sec, especially when running XMMS (and not turning it back on when one uses remote control); 2) Suspending Z when running on battery power and no actions are taken within 1 minute; 3) NOT suspending Z if it runs XMMS and NOT turning off display when it runs mplayer or something like that. The last solution uses more battery power, but this way we won't become mad too often wink.gif as well as we won't get quite a few lockups (as many of you must have been noticed, suspending Z which is running XMMS, turning it back on and starting a replay is a NICE way to lock it up sad.gif)...
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
padishah_emperor
post Jul 7 2004, 07:05 AM
Post #15





Group: Members
Posts: 849
Joined: 6-March 04
Member No.: 2,180



QUOTE(ThC @ Jul 6 2004, 09:58 AM)
..is that the same kind of problem than my pseudo dead pixels ? (having randomly dead pixels at each pdaXrom install - no dead pixels at all under cacko rom)

Yes, this has been a major turn-off for me, I had to switch back to QT, I couldn't bear seeing dead-ish pixels looking at me, that and the power thing..
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

2 Pages V   1 2 >
Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 24th March 2019 - 03:23 AM