Author Topic: C860 Vs C1000 Vs C3000 Performance  (Read 2041 times)

datajerk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 219
    • View Profile
    • http://
C860 Vs C1000 Vs C3000 Performance
« on: April 29, 2005, 09:16:04 am »
Are there any benchmarks or data on performance including battery performance?

So far there isn't a strong argument to upgrade.

Thanks.

kahm

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 657
    • View Profile
C860 Vs C1000 Vs C3000 Performance
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2005, 10:35:39 am »
The three of them are almost 100% identical for performance. The 3000 feels a little slower at times due to the microdrive. (Takes about 10sec longer to boot, programs load slower the first time, etc. 6sec to load opera on the 860, 12 on the 3000. If you cancel and reload the program it is exactly the same on both...)

Battery performance feels about the same - I'm not too worried about total run time other than "Long enough to get through my day" so I haven't run extensive tests.

If you don't find the extra features compelling - better keyboard, 4gb HD, USB host, then there's no point to upgrade. Personally, after using the 860 for a few months I found lots of situations where having the internal storage and USB host would save me lots of trouble and/or enable something I couldn't do before. Getting a 3000 was an absolute need for me.

For someone who's just looking for better battery life or faster performance - look elsewhere. You won't find it in these models.
Fujitsu U8240 "Stormtrooper" -  Zaurus Supplement
Libretto U100 | Sony Librie, Sony Reader
SL-C3100: Sharp 1.11JP (Kanji Dictionary/Translator) - LCD Top swap with C1000.
SL-C3000: pdaXii13 5.4.7, SL-C3000 5.4.9 - microdrive replaced with 8gb Sandisk
SL-C1000: PDAXRom Beta3 | SL-6000L: Sharp 1.12 | SL-5500: Cacko, 64-0 kernel | SL-5000D: OZ-Opie
Linksys WCF12; Sharp CE-AG06, CE-RH2, CE-170TS; iRiver USB OTG Host cable; Socket BT rev.E CF; Hitachi 6gb Microdrive