Author Topic: pointless bickering between pdaxrom and oz people  (Read 4662 times)

sashz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
    • View Profile
    • http://
pointless bickering between pdaxrom and oz people
« on: May 24, 2005, 08:57:56 am »
pdaXrom for SL-C1000 , first version

https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12783

koen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1008
    • View Profile
    • http://dominion.thruhere.net/koen/cms/
pointless bickering between pdaxrom and oz people
« Reply #1 on: May 24, 2005, 09:12:26 am »
Quote
pdaXrom for SL-C1000 , first version

https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=12783
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=81236\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

The topicstarter was asking for an OZ/GPE image, not a pdaXrom image. Stop trolling in the OZ forums
Forums are not bugtrackers!!! Smart questions
Ångström release team
iPAQ h2210, iPAQ h5550, iPAQ hx4700, Zaurus SL-C700, Nokia 770, all running some form of GPE
My blog

pgas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
    • http://
SLC-860 cacko / senao wifi

koen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1008
    • View Profile
    • http://dominion.thruhere.net/koen/cms/
pointless bickering between pdaxrom and oz people
« Reply #3 on: May 24, 2005, 10:47:11 am »
Quote
https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=11214
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=81245\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Your point being? I still can't see where I can find a GPE image for the c1000 in that thread.
Forums are not bugtrackers!!! Smart questions
Ångström release team
iPAQ h2210, iPAQ h5550, iPAQ hx4700, Zaurus SL-C700, Nokia 770, all running some form of GPE
My blog

Teletubbie

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 252
    • View Profile
    • http://
pointless bickering between pdaxrom and oz people
« Reply #4 on: May 24, 2005, 11:00:28 am »
Hey Guys,
wtf about this pdaXrom strikes back action. The thread posted by pgas is not a legitimation for highjacking this thread. Mickey answered in the pdaXrom thread refered by pgas to a user asking for ppaxrom for 5500 because of X. Since there is no pdaXrom for 5500 and OZ/GPE is the only possibility (well pocketworksation too, but if you have a big card) to ron X on a bare 5500, mickey made a valueable contribution to the thread to help the user, not highjacking that thread.
In this thread, well we have a possibility for OZ/GPE on SL-C1000. It is already in the bitbake/OE system. But I don't deny, that it may be usefull to inform users about existing pdaXrom for the c-1000, since there is no (flame)war between OZ and pdaXrom.
Cheers,
Sam
SL-5500G
OZ 3.3.6-pre1
Opie 1.1.4

sashz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
    • View Profile
    • http://
pointless bickering between pdaxrom and oz people
« Reply #5 on: May 24, 2005, 11:00:51 am »
Quote
Quote
https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=11214
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=81245\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Your point being? I still can't see where I can find a GPE image for the c1000 in that thread.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=81250\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

well,  pdaXrom C1000 have few gpe packages in the feed %)

pgas

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1097
    • View Profile
    • http://
pointless bickering between pdaxrom and oz people
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2005, 11:19:24 am »
Teletubbie:  this was exactly my point.

 The guy asking for pdaxrom was not asking for X, just as this thread does not talk about X.
(though I guess what they both really wanted was X)

Mickey made an little ad for OZ/gpe in the pdaxrom thread, sashz is making a little ad for pdaxrom in this thread.

I think it's perfectly normal that they both want to push their babies, and exchange on this forums have been perhaps a bit cold but never agressive and  there was no need for this "Stop trolling in the OZ forums"

(ok I am trolling now  )

Disclaimer: I'm not  a member of pdaxrom, and this point of view is my own.
SLC-860 cacko / senao wifi

koen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1008
    • View Profile
    • http://dominion.thruhere.net/koen/cms/
pointless bickering between pdaxrom and oz people
« Reply #7 on: May 24, 2005, 12:33:37 pm »
Quote
Quote
Quote
https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=11214
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=81245\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Your point being? I still can't see where I can find a GPE image for the c1000 in that thread.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=81250\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

well,  pdaXrom C1000 have few gpe packages in the feed %)
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=81253\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

'Few' and 'Ancient' being the operative words, still no OZ/GPE image there.
Forums are not bugtrackers!!! Smart questions
Ångström release team
iPAQ h2210, iPAQ h5550, iPAQ hx4700, Zaurus SL-C700, Nokia 770, all running some form of GPE
My blog

sashz

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 388
    • View Profile
    • http://
pointless bickering between pdaxrom and oz people
« Reply #8 on: May 24, 2005, 12:55:58 pm »
Quote
Quote
Quote
Quote
https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=11214
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=81245\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Your point being? I still can't see where I can find a GPE image for the c1000 in that thread.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=81250\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

well,  pdaXrom C1000 have few gpe packages in the feed %)
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=81253\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

'Few' and 'Ancient' being the operative words, still no OZ/GPE image there.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=81272\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

of course, because pdaXrom != OZ, i wrote my first message for men who wait X11 rom  but me not author of this topic, sorry.

offroadgeek

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1419
    • View Profile
    • https://www.oesf.org
pointless bickering between pdaxrom and oz people
« Reply #9 on: May 24, 2005, 01:00:29 pm »
to all: enough of this already!

sashz and mickeyl:  there is no need to 'sell' your distro in each others' threads.  in both cases someone had a very specific question about one of the distros, not about X in general.  let's give our community a bit of credit... I believe that most know the difference between pdaxrom and OZ (opie/gpe).  

what is it going to take for the two sides to respect each other for the great work that both teams are doing?

now please, lets go back to arguing about guyhelm's crazy idea for qtopia 2.11 to take over the world
Search the OESF Wiki
C1000 w/Cacko 1.23 beta (from Streamline) / 760 pdaxrom rc9 / 6000L (thanks Santa's elf!) / 5500 - OZ 3.3.5 / SIMpad SL4
1GB, 256mb SanDisk CF / 2x 1GB, 512mb, 256mb, 128mb SanDisk SD
Ambicom WL100C-CF wifi / Socket 56k CF modem / AmbiCom BT2000-CF (x2)
Pocketop keyboard, Piel Frama case (1000 & 5500), PDAir case (760 & 1000)
sip:536093@fwd.pulver.com
| OESF | ELSI | Zaurus User Group | ZaurusThemes |

Pcghost

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 70
    • View Profile
    • http://www.linuxodyssey.org
pointless bickering between pdaxrom and oz people
« Reply #10 on: May 26, 2005, 09:47:18 pm »
As our illustrious admin has pointed out, this arguement is not only pointless, but counterproductive to all of our cause.  Both OZ and PdaXrom offer the abandoned Zaurus users CHOICE, which is why we are all here.  

Thread closed, let's get back to real business.