← previous next →
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5

Author Topic: Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe  (Read 19086 times)

Antikx

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1147
    • View Profile
    • http://tyrannozaurus.com
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #30 on: May 30, 2006, 08:13:49 am »
IMO another factor to consider when selecting a ROM is support. I've had very differnet experiences with OZ and pdaXrom in regards to getting support. I'm talking about the developers and the users. My experiences have not been the deciding factor but have contributed to my general feeling about each ROM.
Logged
Kanpai,
-Antikx (Twitter, Mugshot and PodNova)
C1000 - pdaXrom R198 (Celestial Environment)
tyrannozaurus.com
[img]http://www.tyrannozaurus.com/files/category_pictures/general_1.png\" border=\"0\" class=\"linked-sig-image\" /]
Zaurus news/blogs feed from Zaurus users
Free Windows, Linux, or Web RSS readers.
Featured pages at tyrannozaurus:
Sharp Petition, ScummVM, Cacko, pdaXii13, and Celestial Environment

GadgetGuy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #31 on: May 30, 2006, 08:30:50 am »
Quote
I agree with you wholeheatedly and was wondering how you are finding beta 4 and whether it is stable enough yet to actually use in a working environment with abiword, gnumeric etc

cycle_55
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=128856\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

It is quite stable, however some features still need tweaking ( I hope beta 5 will have those tweaks).

Features like:
- on / off does not work well (sometimes I have to do a full reset to switch the unit back on)
- the keymaps require some work to use the unit
- default fstab not very usable

However, all of these can be overcome today (relatively easily) if
- you use "suspend" to put the unit to sleep
- fix the keymap ( how-to's are available)
- redo fstab ( I have done this: it is not too difficult even for a newbie like myself)

So I overall like it!
« Last Edit: May 30, 2006, 09:25:21 am by GadgetGuy »
Logged
Zaurus C-3100 from PriceJapan with OZ 3.5.4.1. Opie and GPE
Ambicom CF WL1100C Wifi Card and Symbol Wireless Networker CF Wifi Card
1 GB Sandisk Ultra II SD
PdAir leather case - Nintendo DS metal case
various smaller CF and SD cards
all kinds of USB cables and accessories
-------------------------------------------------------------
Previous computers: TI 99/4A, ZX81, C64, Amiga 500, Apple Powerbook 100
Previous PDA's: Palm 1000, Palm III, Palm V, Palm Vx, Audiovox Maestro Pocket PC, Psion 5mx
Current PDA: Palm Tungsten E2
Current favourite: Zaurus C3100 - my "micro laptop"

omro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 796
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #32 on: May 30, 2006, 08:43:40 am »
Quote
IMO another factor to consider when selecting a ROM is support. I've had very differnet experiences with OZ and pdaXrom in regards to getting support. I'm talking about the developers and the users. My experiences have not been the deciding factor but have contributed to my general feeling about each ROM.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=128942\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

How would you characterise those experiences?
Logged
Zaurus C-1000

adf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #33 on: May 30, 2006, 12:15:34 pm »
Quote
Quote
[which reminds me... anyone have a look at xqt speed on 2.6 oz/opie >gpe?  could be  interesting
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=128868\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

qvfb on an OZ X based image (gpe, e, xfce) running opie apps would be a lot easier and faster
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=128902\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
... and preferable, I think.  I hadn't realized it would work as well as you suggest.  Anyone got it going?  have those few really great qt/opie apps--and maybe opera on gpe (or any x11) would solve some otherwise sticky issues.    (so would geeting ssl and javascript going on the gpe browser)

If it is easily doable, shouldn't it be a "standard" option on X roms at some point?.
Logged
**3100 Zubuntu Jaunty,(working on Cacko dualboot), 16G A-Data internal CF, 4G SD, Ambicom WL-1100C Cf, linksys usb ethernet,  BelkinF8T020 BT card, Belkin F8U1500-E Ir kbd, mini targus usb mouse, rechargeble AC/DC powered USB hub, psp cables and battery extenders.

**6000l  Tetsuized Sharprom, installed on internal flash only 1G sd, 2G cf

omro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 796
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #34 on: May 30, 2006, 12:27:01 pm »
Can I ask, how come GPE managed to resize everything perfectly to fit the screen and pdaXrom doesn't and hasn't for a really long time, is there a reason why this bug happens?
Logged
Zaurus C-1000

gromituk

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 207
    • View Profile
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #35 on: May 30, 2006, 12:41:56 pm »
Yes, I might add that the panel is only on the first desktop, and yet on the other ones, maximising windows still leaves space for the panel!  Either have the panel on all desktops, or maximise windows properly on desktops where there isn't a panel.
Logged

adf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #36 on: May 30, 2006, 01:52:38 pm »
window size on pdaxrom depends on the window manager you use.  presumably the same is true in OZ.  GPE (using matchbox, right?) does a nice job.  Fvwm and xfce do well on pdaXrom too.
Logged
**3100 Zubuntu Jaunty,(working on Cacko dualboot), 16G A-Data internal CF, 4G SD, Ambicom WL-1100C Cf, linksys usb ethernet,  BelkinF8T020 BT card, Belkin F8U1500-E Ir kbd, mini targus usb mouse, rechargeble AC/DC powered USB hub, psp cables and battery extenders.

**6000l  Tetsuized Sharprom, installed on internal flash only 1G sd, 2G cf

omro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 796
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #37 on: May 30, 2006, 06:41:58 pm »
I was only commenting that it was odd that the bug persists in pdaXrom from version to version.
Logged
Zaurus C-1000

adf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #38 on: May 30, 2006, 09:09:00 pm »
yeah
Quote
I was only commenting that it was odd that the bug persists in pdaXrom from version to version.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129063\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
yeah... the first real changes to the default wm seem to be in beta 4.  the reason I pointed out the wm issue is that a lot of pdax users change wm.  I think OZ  x11 users might tend to stay more w/ gpe or enlightenment
Logged
**3100 Zubuntu Jaunty,(working on Cacko dualboot), 16G A-Data internal CF, 4G SD, Ambicom WL-1100C Cf, linksys usb ethernet,  BelkinF8T020 BT card, Belkin F8U1500-E Ir kbd, mini targus usb mouse, rechargeble AC/DC powered USB hub, psp cables and battery extenders.

**6000l  Tetsuized Sharprom, installed on internal flash only 1G sd, 2G cf

omro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 796
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #39 on: May 31, 2006, 02:35:26 am »
Quote
yeah
Quote
I was only commenting that it was odd that the bug persists in pdaXrom from version to version.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129063\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
yeah... the first real changes to the default wm seem to be in beta 4.  the reason I pointed out the wm issue is that a lot of pdax users change wm.  I think OZ  x11 users might tend to stay more w/ gpe or enlightenment
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129074\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Could it be that more pdaXrom users change WM because the default one is buggy and not up to scratch, whereas the GPE people stay where they are cause the default window manager is well implemented?
Logged
Zaurus C-1000

adf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #40 on: May 31, 2006, 04:22:57 am »
Quote
Quote
yeah
Quote
I was only commenting that it was odd that the bug persists in pdaXrom from version to version.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129063\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
yeah... the first real changes to the default wm seem to be in beta 4.  the reason I pointed out the wm issue is that a lot of pdax users change wm.  I think OZ  x11 users might tend to stay more w/ gpe or enlightenment
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129074\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Could it be that more pdaXrom users change WM because the default one is buggy and not up to scratch, whereas the GPE people stay where they are cause the default window manager is well implemented?
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129085\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
I think it has more to do with feature sets, size, and speed actually.  The window sizing thing isn't really much of an issue except on the 6000.  the very few apps that pop up oversized windows are handled easily enough with the alt key.  Keep in mind that GPE uses matchbox wm...  pdaxrom can also use matchbox.  It really isn't that much of an issue.  If you really love gpe, then by all means use gpe and be happy. As to why OZ users don't seem to switch.... are there other wm's that are confiured to work well in OZ outta the box?  It might be lack of options as much as "goodness" of gpe.  I actually plan to give gpe a spin this week and see how things run on my 3100. I won't switch wms
Logged
**3100 Zubuntu Jaunty,(working on Cacko dualboot), 16G A-Data internal CF, 4G SD, Ambicom WL-1100C Cf, linksys usb ethernet,  BelkinF8T020 BT card, Belkin F8U1500-E Ir kbd, mini targus usb mouse, rechargeble AC/DC powered USB hub, psp cables and battery extenders.

**6000l  Tetsuized Sharprom, installed on internal flash only 1G sd, 2G cf

desertrat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 743
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #41 on: May 31, 2006, 04:48:56 am »
Quote
Could it be that more pdaXrom users change WM because the default one is buggy and not up to scratch, whereas the GPE people stay where they are cause the default window manager is well implemented?
I can't understand why matchbox/openbox was used as the default WM on pdaxrom. To put it mildly, it's crap compared to practically any of the other popular WMs. The only pro to it (if you can call it that) is that it looks the most PDAish - but given what pdaxrom is all about, maybe that's not such a good thing.

I use IceWM - it's smaller, faster. more stable and has more features than matchbox - what more could I ask for? BTW with icewm it does forces most windows to respect the screen size (the usual exceptions are dialog boxes which simply wouldn't fit within 640x480).

-- cheers
Logged
SL-C3100 / Ambicon WL1100C-CF / pdaXrom 1.1.0beta3 / IceWM

omro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 796
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #42 on: May 31, 2006, 11:44:53 am »
XFCE looks pretty impressive compared to Matchbox also
Logged
Zaurus C-1000

InSearchOf

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1144
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #43 on: May 31, 2006, 11:55:30 am »
Quote
XFCE looks pretty impressive compared to Matchbox also

That is why I use XFCE... I love pdaXrom but... hate matchbox....

Most think it is heavy and steals alot of needed resources... but I dont notice much of a difference...
Logged
Sharp Zaurus SL-C3100 and SL-6000L
pdaXrom Developer
Please visit pdaXrom.org for updates
My Blog
IRC #pdaxrom @ FreeNode

Dima202

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
    • View Profile
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #44 on: May 31, 2006, 01:29:44 pm »
Yeah, I switched to icewm also!   I really feel like I am home with this WM.  
I recommend anyone who has matchbox to switch!
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
← previous next →