There was an article on \"The Register\" regarding IBM filing for closure on the basis of copyright not being owned by SCO or something like that.
It looked like it would stop SCO from making general sweeping claims.
It was a little \"fuzzy\", I think the logic was simply if you don\'t own the copyright, then you can\'t get upset with us for copying \"your\" code. And if you feel we have breached copyright, then you are required to list the exact items to which you own copyright that we are supposed to have breached.
The bit that did not add up, was that the author thought even if IBM won on this bases, it would not let other companies SCO are trying to rip off (IMHO) off the hook.
Thought I\'d put the IMHO in, don\'t want to be procecuted