If there\'s no mistake, here is the replies:
<<
Mike Humberston wrote:
> \"Paul Taylor\" <no way> wrote:
>
>>\"Mike Humberston\" <oblivion@philomel.net> wrote in message
>>news:mhf47057gje566bo14kf8dr2stu4rv6nre@4ax.com...
>>> \"Paul Taylor\" <no way> wrote:
>>>
>>> >It wouldn\'t stretch the imagination to think of a netBook pro (or
>>> >successors)
>>> >running Linux, hopefully with built-in Psion applications like Data?
>>>
>>> Some people never do discover that Father Christmas doesn\'t
>>> really exist!
>>
>>Someone has to make the toys :-)
>
> That is true but it won\'t be Psion. They,ve been there before
> and in the end it almost cost them their company. The market has
> moved on. They would have very little chance of carving out a
> new niche within it.
>
There\'s still million of Psion 3a/3c/3mx/siena/5/5mx/5mx pro/revo/revo+/..
out there. All those users are waiting for something that could replace
their device. Ask for it in old Psion reseller shop and you will
understand. The same user base that has permitted Psion to born live and
thrive during more than a decade is still there... waiting. They are
Hi-tech curstomers, intelligent people, executive... and they trust their
intuition and not the mass market waves.
Yes, those users have certainly the hope to see something emerge on the
market. Not a Palm or a Pocket PC. Not a Psion or an Epoc device. Just a
PDA/Smartphone with very good hardware like the Sharp Zaurus SL-C860 and
with software like... old Psion software.
Sharp Zaurus software are... really crap.
There is NO pda on the market that can replace my Psion S5mx or my netBook.
Noone! I tried them all and stupidly buy a few of them. They are all
staying in their box today. Linux is the best operating system for a
manufacturer wanting to have a stable OS without giving royalties. Only big
problem: if you don\'t know how to manage the Open Source Community, they
won\'t help you and will try to fork your curstomised OS.
Zaurus hardware is exactly what all Psion users were asking for: 65535
colors on a 640*480 screen (instead of 640*240 16 gray scale), imaginative
design (keyboard and swiveling screen), powerfull processor (400Mhz PXA255
on a 200Mhz bus instead of 37Mhz on a ARM720T), lot of memory (64Mo SDRAM
instead of 16Mo of conventionnal RAM), big internal flash (128Mo of r/w
flash instead of 16Mo of ROM on 5mx), CF and SD/MMC card support (full card
compatibility instead of only memory CF on S5mx), usb/serial/irDa support
(only serial and irDa on S5mx), Wifi/Bluetooth card... drivers (none on
5mx), Multi-media player, Sync with Mac, very tinny...
But the internal software can\'t be compared. In fact yes, the comparision
can be made but you should inverse the device. To be short: Zaurus software
are crap and unusable for most Psion users. The Psion 5mx application are
still the best despite all this time. With its 16Mo RAM, 16Mo ROM and its
old ARM720T 37Mhz processor, a Psion S5mx is more complete and faster than
a Zaurus SL-C860 400Mhz 64Mo RAM 128Mo ROM and with an ATI accelerated
video card. The 5mx with its 8 years old is a dinosaur. It\'s the 5mx that
should have been called Zaurus and not the Sharp device. The Sharp hardware
is very good. The Sharp software deserve the Zaurus name.
Note : Zaurus PDA QT/E libraries are 100 time easier and complete than Psion
Epoc ones. In spite of everything, the software are worst. They are million
of users on the market that are still waiting to be able to replace their
old Psion by something. As padishah_emperor said in another thread, it\'s
not the Sharp plan.
Regards
Amrein-Marie Christophe
>>
----
The difference is that if Psion software were crap, you\'d be stuck. If
you think Zaurus programs are crap, write better ones.
----
If Psion software were crap, it would be the same feeling than upgrading
Windows 3.11 by Windows 2000. At present, the impression is inverted.
And of course I could write/design better software but this answer is only
relevant for developers and not standard users. In the x millions of
Palm/Psion/Pocket PC users, how many would be able (would like and would
have the time) to build their own PIM software just for fun? It\'s not the
goal of a PDA.
----
http://www.openzaurus.organd/or
http://opie.handhelds.org/Enjoy.
------
I\'m part of the
http://opie.handhelds.org/ project. I know all projects
arround PDA and Linux on the net. I\'m still have the same observation: no
software from those projects can replace the 8 years old Psion software
(and I\'m very kind as I only talk about the 5mx and not the Psion Series 3a
released 12 years ago with a 7Mhz 80x86 NecV30 processor).
Really, I would like to be able to \'Enjoy\'.
OZ and Opie guys are doing a great job thougth. Their software or
buildsystem are in some part better than Pocket PC. But the Psion software
level is too high.
----
When I say in some part, it\'s mainly because Pocket PC developer has RAD
tools and because you need to know Linux a little to be able to get
involved quickly in Opie or OE/OZ developpement. Every Opie applications
surpass the Pocket PC one and are more user friendly.
----
I agree that SIBO and EPOC software that is standard on Psion palmtops
is far superior to anything else on the market, and probably will
remain so for some time. But not forever, and that\'s the catch: Psion
development, like the Newton\'s, is dead, hence the rest can only get
better (well, some of it at least; there\'s no way in hell Wince
software will ever even become passable, let alone good).
(sidenote: considering the differences in philosophy and form factor,
Newton software still bloody marvelous, and the only platform that
compares favourably to the Psion)