Author Topic: Anyone ever consider porting Ted?  (Read 2445 times)

yzord

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
    • http://
Anyone ever consider porting Ted?
« on: October 21, 2004, 10:26:45 am »
Hello,
With the dearth of word processors for the Z, I was wondering if anyone had ever considered porting Ted. It's a WYSIWYG rtf editor, with lots of features (check out http://www.nllgg.nl/Ted/) - even a proper spell check! I noticed Ted when I was playing around with Damn Small Linux on an old laptop, and thought it would make a really good addition to the Z (heck, it's already way better than Hancom, and hopefully it'll be quicker than Textmaker).

Unfortunately, it's only for X, so it might be a little challenging to port to QT - however, if so would anyone consider compiling it for XQT/PDAXROM?

Thanks,
Yz
« Last Edit: October 21, 2004, 10:28:03 am by yzord »

adf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
    • http://
Anyone ever consider porting Ted?
« Reply #1 on: December 10, 2004, 12:50:10 am »
It works fine on pocketworkstation.
I'm running oz 3.5.2 opie on a 5600 with pocket workstation.
on the pocketworkstation  system just apt-get install ted..and you're off
also got scite firefox (slow) dillo. trying to find a small spreadsheet. I wanted to find siag.. but no luck I guess gnumeric.

google pocketworkstation
it takes some getting used to... bu it is really amazing``
**3100 Zubuntu Jaunty,(working on Cacko dualboot), 16G A-Data internal CF, 4G SD, Ambicom WL-1100C Cf, linksys usb ethernet,  BelkinF8T020 BT card, Belkin F8U1500-E Ir kbd, mini targus usb mouse, rechargeble AC/DC powered USB hub, psp cables and battery extenders.

**6000l  Tetsuized Sharprom, installed on internal flash only 1G sd, 2G cf