Critisism is fine but it must be constructive. Moaning about things is not fine; if I\'ve paid for something then I feel entitled to moan about it if it doesn\'t do what I want, but if I\'ve downloaded it for free then the story is different. If people have a problem then please bring it to the attention of the developers (and those like me who try to help out) and in the fullness of time it will be addressed (because of a lack of people and the difficulty of re-creating problems too).
Saiten\'s original issue was why people always suggest OZ as an alternative to problems with the Sharp ROM. Basically because OZ has been developed and has addressed the orginal issues which Qtopia had. This is not to say that it\'s perfect, but it is developing. This brings me on to his second point about there never being a final, finished, polished stable version. This is true and it is an issue. I personally think that to get more people on board OZ (and Qtopia to tell the truth) should become more polished (though whether these people would contribute to the coding and general development is questionable), but if I could get developing I would probably be more inclined to develop new things as they are more interesting to me now. It\'s a catch 22, I can\'t really remember what I found difficult when I started using OZ so can\'t really know what I ought to try and make more polished. This is where constructive critisism comes in.
Si
