Author Topic: Why Not Use Bittorrent?  (Read 4393 times)

DrWowe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
    • View Profile
    • http://
Why Not Use Bittorrent?
« on: December 30, 2005, 03:31:49 am »
The server seems to be responding a bit slowly right now, probably because everyone is downloading the new release?

Why not use BitTorrent for the big files (release images, feed.tar.gz, pdaX86, etc) and just use http for the feeds?

It will make everyone download faster, save you guys $$$, and it provides automatic mirroring in case the server fails again.

Think about it.
« Last Edit: December 30, 2005, 03:32:09 am by DrWowe »

iamphet

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 51
    • View Profile
    • http://iamphet.nm.ru
Why Not Use Bittorrent?
« Reply #1 on: December 30, 2005, 04:20:14 am »
DrWowe
I know why not use _only_ Bittorrent. Some users (including me) are behind restrictive firewalls.

omega

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
    • View Profile
    • http://
Why Not Use Bittorrent?
« Reply #2 on: December 30, 2005, 01:39:14 pm »
same here...   but I do think it would be an option for many people...
Gorgeous C860, 256 Sandisk SD, 1Gig Pretec 40x CF, PDAIR leather case & the really cool retractable iPDA USB sync/charge cable. Powered by PDAXROM BETA 1.

My wish - to have a Command & Conquer style game on my Z! (FREECNC!!!) Simcity 2000 would also be great.

anunakin

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 340
    • View Profile
    • http://vivaphp.net
Why Not Use Bittorrent?
« Reply #3 on: December 30, 2005, 03:02:46 pm »
We can put ISO files, and TAR.GZ full feeds in torrents....
[img]http://www.vivaphp.net/imagens/rev2.jpg\" border=\"0\" class=\"linked-sig-image\" /]
Anunakin (Marcus Fazzi)

Nokia N900 32GB + microSD 2GB
Nokia N810 w/ microSD 8GB
Nokia 5310 XpressMusic w/ microSD 1GB
HP48GX->Psion Sienna->Palm m130->Tungsten T->Zaurus SL-5500->C3000->C3100 ALL SOLD

My FEED(On Line AGAIN!!!)

DrWowe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 696
    • View Profile
    • http://
Why Not Use Bittorrent?
« Reply #4 on: December 30, 2005, 03:58:18 pm »
Quote
We can put ISO files, and TAR.GZ full feeds in torrents....

Yeah, that's what I was thinking.  It's the big files that cause the most bandwidth.

For the firewalled users, that's what mirrors are for.  If the pdaX devs can save some money on hosting costs, it benefits everyone.

desertrat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 743
    • View Profile
    • http://
Why Not Use Bittorrent?
« Reply #5 on: December 31, 2005, 04:40:19 am »
I really can't see how using BitTorrent would work. Maybe it's because I've never had any good experience using it. Even for "popular" stuff like Debian and Mandrake, using BitTorrent often results in transfer rates of a few KB/sec -- if I'm lucky, more often I get less than 1KB/sec! Contrast it with the upto 200-300KB/sec that I can get using their official mirrors I know what I would rather use.

Might be a better idea to use something like http://rapidshare.de/. I've always got transfer rates of at least 10KB/sec, usually around 30-50KB/sec, and sometimes several hundred KB/sec (probably when my ISP has it cached).

-- cheers
SL-C3100 / Ambicon WL1100C-CF / pdaXrom 1.1.0beta3 / IceWM

Zal42

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 15
    • View Profile
Why Not Use Bittorrent?
« Reply #6 on: January 01, 2006, 01:49:01 pm »
Quote
Even for "popular" stuff like Debian and Mandrake, using BitTorrent often results in transfer rates of a few KB/sec[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=109015\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

This has been my experience, too. I only use bittorrent when there's no other option or I'm feeling very patient, as for large files it's often an overnight operation.

On the other hand, it never hurts to have multiple methods of distribution!