← previous next →
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Kismet On 3.5.3?  (Read 3398 times)

radioz

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 102
    • View Profile
Kismet On 3.5.3?
« on: January 31, 2005, 12:51:06 pm »
I just picked up an Ambicom WL1100 card for my 5600. Plugged it in and it seems to work ok so far.

I'd like to try playing with Kismet, but cant find it in the feed. Has anyone had success with it in 3.5.2? If so, where did you get it and how did you install it?

Thx

radioz

[OOps: the title should have read: 3.5.2. Sorry!]
« Last Edit: January 31, 2005, 12:54:44 pm by radioz »
Logged
5600 PXA-255
Hentges OZ 3.5.4.2
PQI 1G SD
PQI 256M SD
Socket LP 10/100 Ethernet
Ambicom WL1100C Wifi

XorA

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 101
    • View Profile
    • http://
Kismet On 3.5.3?
« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2005, 06:46:51 am »
I have the one from OE compiled, but I need to reflash my Z before I can test it and submit the changes.
Logged
--
SL-C860 XorABuild/GPE
Sandisk Connect Plus SD/1GMB CF/512M
BT PCMCIA

Sniffer

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 34
    • View Profile
Kismet On 3.5.3?
« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2005, 07:26:45 am »
Not sure if this is of any use as its for 3.5.1 but im assuming the instructions should work for 3.5.2 as well.

Personally I just use wellenreiter, trouble free install and works without error.


EDIT
If you follow those instructions kismet works fine on 3.5.2 (5500), even Kismet-Qt works (needs the compat libs). For some reason Kismet-Qt didn't come with an icon? so I just made a desktop file and all works fine.
« Last Edit: February 01, 2005, 11:37:36 am by Sniffer »
Logged

h2gofast

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
    • View Profile
Kismet On 3.5.3?
« Reply #3 on: February 01, 2005, 09:35:16 am »
I've heard wellenrieter is good, but I think kismet is worth at least a little extra effort to get it running.  If I have it right, kismet is a passive sniffer which means you're invisible, whereas wellenrieter is like netstumbler which sends out probe request to see who responds.  If a wireless router doesn't respond then netstumbler/wellenrieter won't find it.  Correct me if I'm wrong.
Logged

Mickeyl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1495
    • View Profile
    • http://www.Vanille.de
Kismet On 3.5.3?
« Reply #4 on: February 01, 2005, 12:02:13 pm »
Quote
I've heard wellenrieter is good, but I think kismet is worth at least a little extra effort to get it running.  If I have it right, kismet is a passive sniffer which means you're invisible, whereas wellenrieter is like netstumbler which sends out probe request to see who responds.  If a wireless router doesn't respond then netstumbler/wellenrieter won't find it.  Correct me if I'm wrong.

You're wrong.

Wellenreiter is a passive sniffer.
Logged
Cheers,

Michael 'Mickey' Lauer | Embedded Linux Freelancer | www.Vanille-Media.de
Consider donating, if you like the software I contribute to.

h2gofast

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 33
    • View Profile
Kismet On 3.5.3?
« Reply #5 on: February 01, 2005, 01:45:01 pm »
Quote
Quote
I've heard wellenrieter is good, but I think kismet is worth at least a little extra effort to get it running.  If I have it right, kismet is a passive sniffer which means you're invisible, whereas wellenrieter is like netstumbler which sends out probe request to see who responds.  If a wireless router doesn't respond then netstumbler/wellenrieter won't find it.  Correct me if I'm wrong.

You're wrong.

Wellenreiter is a passive sniffer.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=64925\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

thanks
Logged
Pages: [1]
← previous next →