Understandable. I'm also still hoping for that C960 that never appeared yet. I wonder also if they're going to keep the microdrive approach or if they will come out with any more flash-only models.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=67108\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
Interested in hearing your views on the use of Microdrive with the small NAND bootloader. Until I got a better picture of the architecture in my own mind I was still favouring the pure flash based OS models.
I recently discovered a posting that discussed a complete recovery process and revealed that the 3000 actually has a complete minimal NAND based Linux distro accessable by cold start with D+B held down so if the HDD does become totally unrecoverable and needs flattening then its possible to do the prep work from this boot environment (handily I now have a hdd1.tar.gz file containing the minimal stuff needed for the first partition too!).
Now that this element of the 3000 has been somewhat decloaked I can see that it is more desirable to have a hack at the environment and produce new ROMs for the 3000 so wasting no time I've ordered mine already - not heard anything back from the supplier yet though.
Personally that 4Gb storage without sacrificing the CF slot for Wifi was just too tempting... it does mean that I'll have to offload the SL-C860 to keep the missus happy that I'm not on a rampant gadget spree though.
It's interesting that the openbsd boys are strides ahead with their port for the 3000 compared to the 860, I guess with all that storage on board it's less of a show stopper to worry about getting that elusive SD driver nailed (yes I know you have that going for the 860 on the 2.6 Kernel - bravo!)
Anyway, apart from your dislike of Embeddix kernels Mickey what are your thoughts on the 3000.