Author Topic: Quality Team For OZ  (Read 12212 times)

lardman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4512
    • View Profile
    • http://people.bath.ac.uk/enpsgp/Zaurus/
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #15 on: March 03, 2004, 08:04:56 am »
Fine. Going slightly off topic here, what happens if two people are modifying the same page (and even the same line) at the same time? :-)


Si
C750 OZ3.5.4 (GPE, 2.6.x kernel)
SL5500 OZ3.5.4 (Opie)
Nokia 770
Serial GPS, WCF-12, Socket Ethernet & BT, Ratoc USB
WinXP, Mandriva

Mickeyl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1495
    • View Profile
    • http://www.Vanille.de
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #16 on: March 03, 2004, 08:32:43 am »
Last time I checked Wiki acts like cvs here, i.e. presenting you a conflict and let you sort out manually using a difference view.
Cheers,

Michael 'Mickey' Lauer | Embedded Linux Freelancer | www.Vanille-Media.de
Consider donating, if you like the software I contribute to.

ScottYelich

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 992
    • View Profile
    • http://www.zaurususergroup.com/modules.php?opmodload&namephpWiki&filei
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #17 on: March 03, 2004, 09:21:25 am »
Quote
This is my take on OZ development.  There needs to be comprehensive documentation on how to get started.  A command by command step on how/where to download source, what command to build and what to get started would be of great help.  

Most people get turned off by the fact they have no clue (myself included) where to start.  Instead of writing a 1 page doc, if actual commands are given to
download
build
Test run the environment

That would go  a long way in enlisting new members.

Also, for each app, have a list of small todos so newbies can take a shot at it.  Also should have good doc on each app head as to how to build it, what package is needed to run it on a particular h/w, what needs to be fixed, what priorty etc.

The problem with OZ site is it is hardly updated and is skimpy on the details.  

No offense meant Mickey, I greatly appreciate what you guys are doing.  You guys are the only reason I\'m still sticking to Z.  But this is what I think is honestly missing.  It is not that people are dumb or anything, I know if we really put our mind to it, we can figure out how to get the source, do the test build and get started, but if all this info is already available, it makes it easy.

I guess it is just inertia!

I agree 100%.  I have *yet* to get the old build system to work.  I have yet to get the NEW build system to work.  Yes, two people are doing all of the work, but perhaps the effort is in the wrong place!  I\'ll say there are no docs, you\'ll come back and insist there are... perhaps even give a link.  I\'ll try the docs, and the second command will fail.  I\'ll stae this.  You\'ll come back \"well, it works for me\" ... and, another developer doesn\'t come on board.

face it -- if you want more people to help -- you\'ve got to HELP more people!  I\'m glad -- we\'re glad... it works for you.  But, it just doesn\'t work for me/us.

I have a redhat 7.2 machine.  I have absolutely NO WAY to upgrade the OS.  Sorry.  I have a freebsd 5.2-CURRENT machine... it\'s slow, and not good for a dev machine.  Where are the docs that will show me how to do OE build system on either of these?  Where do I go to get a question anwered where I won\'t be told \"well, it works for me\" or have to wait 3 weeks for a sentence to be completed to answer my question?

Make a damn wiki for this.  Have a page that has the steps... when people post questions
into the wiki with links off the howto page, there should be answers.  timely answers.  Ya, ya, you\'re developng the build system -- but the fact is, that energy is probably better put into getting more developers on board.

I\'m working on the pdaXrom -- why?  there\'s an SDK.  Does it work?  Seems to -- for most people.  Did it work for me?  of course not... but, I\'m working through the issues and people are actually working with me.

OZ has the right idea -- but I agree that two people probably can\'t keep it up to the excellent standards at the same pace



just my opinion.


Scott

lardman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4512
    • View Profile
    • http://people.bath.ac.uk/enpsgp/Zaurus/
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #18 on: March 03, 2004, 09:43:09 am »
The GettingStarted page worked for me (I know that\'s not what you want to hear ;-)), perhaps a forum for OE questions as I prefer the speed of forums to email (my posting seem to take up to 3 days to appear on the mailing list). I\'m quite happy to answer questions (once I\'ve worked out how to get it all working myself ;-)).

http://www.openembedded.org/phpwiki/index..../GettingStarted is the getting started page I was talking about.


Si
C750 OZ3.5.4 (GPE, 2.6.x kernel)
SL5500 OZ3.5.4 (Opie)
Nokia 770
Serial GPS, WCF-12, Socket Ethernet & BT, Ratoc USB
WinXP, Mandriva

Anonymous

  • Guest
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #19 on: March 03, 2004, 10:45:31 am »
Good start!

Stubear

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1164
    • View Profile
    • http://
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #20 on: March 03, 2004, 10:55:43 am »
Is there a way to use already installed Qtopia and QPE?

I\'ve already installed the gcc2 cross-compiler and the Qtopia/QPE for 1.54 (Sharp Rom) and I can create pacages using tmake, I\'ve installed oe and can compile non-qt apps no probs. Now I want to move on - for various reasons I want to keep sharp based roms (moslty to do with the Japanese-English translation software I need for work)

I\'m willing to help out anyway I can, but IRC seems to give me few answers (I think it\'s a timezone thing). The wiki isn\'t clear on what is needed to help OE and OZ progress - maybe I\'m missing something

Stu
SL-C1000, Hand converted to English with Japanese Input
Running X apps via X/Qt
iRiver USB host cable; Diatec P-Cord usb power cable (extendable); Acro's Reel Cable USB (A to A, B, Mini-B,  & Mini-B 8pin); GreenHouse 1Gb PicoDrive+; 2x256Mb Hagiwara SD cards; 128Mb Transcend CF card; 512Mb PQI CF card; AmbiCom WL1100C-CF 11B WLAN card

franktj2000

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 13
    • View Profile
    • http://
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #21 on: March 03, 2004, 12:53:53 pm »
Maybe we just need to organize the effort more.  We can start with a team of volunteers, each one starts with a task, just like creating documentation.  I can already see a couple of people on this thread starting this.  Then, someone to divide the tasks into categories, then on each category a very specific task to do.  People can then sign up to do each task.  Also, the skills needed for each task.  Then, setup a webpage with the status of the effort on a regular basis.  I think if people see the actual progress on a task by task basis regularly, then they might be more interested to join in development.
I know in my case, I feel there are many things to do, and I dont know where to start.  I also  thought there were already people on certain things, so i was thinking that I am not needed anymore, so I was surprised to find out that only two people right now.

Anyway, just my thoughts...maybe now we can have lardman doing request for help in addition to mickeyl :-)

lardman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4512
    • View Profile
    • http://people.bath.ac.uk/enpsgp/Zaurus/
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #22 on: March 03, 2004, 01:18:32 pm »
This can all be done on the Wiki. Just create a couple of new pages to stick the stuff in (sign up, division of tasks, etc.), that way it\'s all out in the open and all in one place. Plus, though I don\'t think I really need to say this, we are talking about oe so we should have all of the info on the oe website.


Si
C750 OZ3.5.4 (GPE, 2.6.x kernel)
SL5500 OZ3.5.4 (Opie)
Nokia 770
Serial GPS, WCF-12, Socket Ethernet & BT, Ratoc USB
WinXP, Mandriva

Anonymous

  • Guest
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #23 on: March 03, 2004, 01:59:31 pm »
Mickey, what are the tasks in OZ that badly need volunteers?  We\'ll start from there.

Anonymous

  • Guest
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #24 on: March 03, 2004, 02:31:35 pm »
Perhaps something that would be useful in \'lowering the barrier to entry\' for people wanting to help with OZ development but having trouble / unwilling to setup a development workstation would be a live cd that contained everything needed. With this all people need to do is download and burn the image and then boot from it to be in an already setup development environment. I seem to remember something similar for qtopia development but cant say I\'ve ever used it.
Anyway, if people think it would be useful, and would use it I\'ll be happy to set about creating a useable live cd development environment.
Let me know what you all thinks

dys

dys

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 29
    • View Profile
    • http://
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #25 on: March 03, 2004, 02:36:13 pm »
The above post was me !!! my session timed out.

Richjn

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
    • View Profile
    • http://
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #26 on: March 03, 2004, 05:33:38 pm »
A couple of people have posted that the build system instructions don\'t work for them. I suspect that the main reason for this is missing libaries or whole modules being missing in there build enviroment. In my case I failed first time round on a libary but the output errors described in the log files only described a generic error rather than the specific libary missing so it took a bit of hunting around (trying to build packages out of order) before I got the specific error that led me to the answer. Perhaps the first job should be to describe the full list of \"tools\" required before the build system will work. Trouble is, development wise, I have just about everything installed so this may be a bit of a task and also picking the packages from differing unix distributions that contain these liabaries may be trying.

I can do Redhat-8/9/Fedora and Mandrake 9/10 any offers for the others ?

Simon
As we both have working OE build enviroments perhaps it would be best if we compare notes first.

Richard

bluey

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
    • View Profile
    • http://
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #27 on: March 05, 2004, 09:41:59 am »
host www.openembedded.org
Host www.openembedded.org not found: 3(NXDOMAIN)

host www.openembedded.com
www.openembedded.com is an alias for vhost.sourceforge.net.
vhost.sourceforge.net has address 66.35.250.210

There is something wrong with the ns configuration...
SL-5500 - OZ 3.5.3
256Mb Kingston SD Card
64Mb PQI CF Card
Netgear MA701 WiFi CF Card
Mandriva GNU/Linux LE2005
Dreaming of a C model...

bluey

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 125
    • View Profile
    • http://
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #28 on: March 05, 2004, 09:47:09 am »
I was able to compile the starting packages, but now i get this everytime I try to compile any other package?

checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables

What could be the problem?
SL-5500 - OZ 3.5.3
256Mb Kingston SD Card
64Mb PQI CF Card
Netgear MA701 WiFi CF Card
Mandriva GNU/Linux LE2005
Dreaming of a C model...

Mickeyl

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1495
    • View Profile
    • http://www.Vanille.de
Quality Team For OZ
« Reply #29 on: March 05, 2004, 11:02:29 am »
Inspect the config.log file of that package.
Cheers,

Michael 'Mickey' Lauer | Embedded Linux Freelancer | www.Vanille-Media.de
Consider donating, if you like the software I contribute to.