Author Topic: Cf Vs Sd Vs Nand  (Read 2951 times)

portalgod

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 65
    • View Profile
    • http://www.rajeshprakash.com
Cf Vs Sd Vs Nand
« on: April 11, 2007, 12:28:37 am »
This msg has been retracted.
« Last Edit: April 11, 2007, 12:38:09 am by portalgod »
SL-C1000 w/pdaXii13 Akita (base) + select apps
4GB Transcend 150x SD, 4GB Transcend 120x CF
Planex gw-cf11x CF Wi-Fi, Buffalo CF LAN
UT-41 USB GPS
Misc other SD and CF cards

ZDevil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
    • View Profile
    • http://
Cf Vs Sd Vs Nand
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2007, 12:00:40 pm »
Any more objective benchmarking tests apart from impressionistic remarks?
What i really want to know is the speed of MD versus CF  (hi-speed, such as 150x), because the results would tell whether it's really worth swapping the internal MD ...

Life is too precious for hacking *too much*
Visit my Z screencap gallery[/color]
My EeePC 701 Black = Debian (Lenny) on IceRocks + Transcend SDHC Class6 8GB + 2GB RAM
My Zaurus SL-C3200 = Debian EABI (kernel 2.6.24.3-yonggun) on a swapped internal Sandisk Extreme III CF 16gb
My Debian EABI feed: http://matrixmen.free.fr/zaurus/debian/
My OpenBSD/Zaurus feeds:  Link1, Link2
[/i][/font][/color][/size]