Author Topic: tkcRom 1.0 vs 2.0 alpha?  (Read 1360 times)

andyberry

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
    • http://
tkcRom 1.0 vs 2.0 alpha?
« on: May 29, 2004, 09:40:48 am »
Hola.
I noticed in that there is a Kompany ROM 1.0 and a 2.0 alpha-3.  On the download page, they both have same date ( 12-Dec-2003), but I\'m assuming that\'s incorrect.

What\'s the diff between them? I haven\'t been able to find mention of the 2.0 alpha anywhere (besides a couple of pages where folks mention that they\'re running it).


Thanks.
-A
P.S.  Oh ya.. I\'m a newb, so please be gentle.

andyberry

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
    • http://
tkcRom 1.0 vs 2.0 alpha?
« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2004, 12:48:47 pm »
:cry:
Anybody?

Violator

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 19
    • View Profile
    • http://
tkcRom 1.0 vs 2.0 alpha?
« Reply #2 on: June 04, 2004, 04:20:25 pm »
I was running 2.0 alpha 3 but found that you couldn\'t backup to CF or SD. The only way to backup was using the PC Zaurus backup software. I found that Zaurus would lock up occasionally. When rebooting following a lock up an error occurred (can\'t remember what) and I would have to reflash and restore. I have since changed back to SharpRom 3.13 with Cacko Kernel for APM. This is a lot more stable with the only issue being the battery light flashing sometimes when connected to power. This is well documented on this forum and the fix is to disconnect and suspend Zaurus before reconnecting. Anyway I know that TKCRom 1.0 can backup but not sure of any other differences to 2.0.

andyberry

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
    • http://
tkcRom 1.0 vs 2.0 alpha?
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2004, 05:54:52 am »
 
Hey, thanks Violator.  That\'s good to know.
-A

revdjenk

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 48
    • View Profile
    • http://
tkcRom 1.0 vs 2.0 alpha?
« Reply #4 on: June 08, 2004, 06:45:00 am »
andyberry

Violator has done a good job of the differences. although for me, I found 2.0 faster than 1.0 I have been very happy with it, and have not experienced the problem that violator shares.

God Bless
Doug
God Bless
Doug

These are the words of him who has the Sharp...
Revelation 2:12

highfell

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 63
    • View Profile
    • http://
tkcRom 1.0 vs 2.0 alpha?
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2004, 07:30:48 am »
Quote
andyberry

Violator has done a good job of the differences. although for me, I found 2.0 faster than 1.0 I have been very happy with it, and have not experienced the problem that violator shares.


I used to use the the 2.0. alpha version but the back-up function doesn\'t work. This seems to be a known issue. I only used the 2.00 alpha version because it was a later version but I didn\'t notice any difference.

I have now reverted to the 1.00 version.

Hope this helps

Nigel Bamber
SL 5500 128 CF card ; Bluetooth Anycom CF
TKR v1.0 Cacko Kernel 32/30 memory layout