The OZ 3.3.6 Source is newer than the old Sharp rom source while still being compatible (in 3.3.2 anyway).
I'd guess thats why they picked it over the old Sharp sources.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=73882\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
If it worked, it would be a good decision. On the 6k wireless is gone in 2.1. There are newer patched 2.4 kernels ( I think they are newer anyway) from tetsu that actually support the hardware in the box. I don't mean to sound cranky about this, but even OZ came out with better hardware support in their 1st shot on the 6k--and they admit to being unstable. Qtopia's pitch has been "it works--bleeding edge is bad because it doesn't work right" I am surprised to see this. Not disappointed, or inclined to blame trolltech for a messy demo or anything like that (2.1 is pretty cool)--it is simply the opposite of what I had understood their position on development to be--it is ..OEish. I'm sure that something that works beautiflly will come out of this eventually.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=73898\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
wifi works on the 6000, you just have to manually edit one file, and run commands to get it running.
Also, there is not a slew of developers working 24/7 on these roms.. just one. and I have many other duties to do as well.
If you don't like the few limitations there are, don't use it.
Patches and fixes are of course, welcome...
I never once said "it works--bleeding edge is bad because it doesn't work right". What I said was these roms use a _stable_ openzaurus. Stable as in not a constantly moving target version revisions. Debian stable is quite slow moving in this aspect also.
The reason I did not use a Sharp based rom, is that they are not a very standard Linux directory structure and its difficult to maintain. Actually, the a300 rom is based on the Sharp rom, and I believe this is the only non Sharp rom for this device.
