- The Cxx00 screens are 3.7" diagonal, which is something like .2" larger than an SL5500, but that much isn't seriously noticable unless you have both units right side by side. The big difference, as bluedevils mentioned, is the resolution: it's 640x480 on the Cxx00 and only 320x200 on the SL5500, so it has four times as many pixels. That resolution is immediately obvious.
- One drawback is the resolution is so high that SL5500 apps have super tiny widgets and text, often times, when "Display Magnified" is unchecked. Most work just fine in a 320x200 window on the screen, but man. Talk about squinting! (snicker) Kpacman has such itty bitty ghosts it's almost comical.
- I'd take any Cxx00 over any SL, even the 6000, because I'm a real fan of clamshells. If you like the SL form factor, there are a number of used 6000 series for sale here on the forum ... you may want one of them instead. (shrug) Not trying to dissuade you, I'm just pointing out alternatives. (grin)
- Me, I think Sharp has several warehouses full of these 3.7" screens from the long production runs of the Cxx0 series, and they're proven technology in the rotating-screen environment. I'd just love to have that extra .3", but I don't. It's also possible the side-on view of the SL6000 screen isn't that hot ... Hiro's screen actually looks better in portrait than in landscape, and this effect may be unnaccebtably pronounced with the larger screen. Any SL6000 owners out there can check that? (wink)
- Good luck!