Author Topic: Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe  (Read 19513 times)

GadgetGuy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #45 on: May 31, 2006, 02:29:35 pm »
Quote
Yeah, I switched to icewm also!   I really feel like I am home with this WM.   
I recommend anyone who has matchbox to switch!
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129165\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Can you please tell which .ipk you have used to do this?
Is this it: icewm-pdaxrom_0.0.5-2_armv5tel.ipk? Is that all you need to install?

Also: how do you launch icewm, after it is installed? With startx? Do you maybe need to remove matchbox first?
Zaurus C-3100 from PriceJapan with OZ 3.5.4.1. Opie and GPE
Ambicom CF WL1100C Wifi Card and Symbol Wireless Networker CF Wifi Card
1 GB Sandisk Ultra II SD
PdAir leather case - Nintendo DS metal case
various smaller CF and SD cards
all kinds of USB cables and accessories
-------------------------------------------------------------
Previous computers: TI 99/4A, ZX81, C64, Amiga 500, Apple Powerbook 100
Previous PDA's: Palm 1000, Palm III, Palm V, Palm Vx, Audiovox Maestro Pocket PC, Psion 5mx
Current PDA: Palm Tungsten E2
Current favourite: Zaurus C3100 - my "micro laptop"

dlj0

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 218
    • View Profile
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #46 on: May 31, 2006, 08:53:56 pm »
Quote
Quote

Abiword is more responsive on GPE?  For one, I didn't know it existed on GPE.  I used OZ/GPE last year and found that noticably lacking.

But why the urge to use OO?  I find that Abiword, on my Z or my desktop, to be so much more responsive that I never use OO.  And as far as spreadsheets go, gnumeric is the standard now, IMNSHO.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=128835\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

I use open office on a PC and a Mac and in our office, using open office file formats. To have openoffice on the Z would be fantastic, because then I don't need to convert my files into other formats for abiword to read. Last time I looked, admittedly a long time ago, abiword doesn't support open office formats, neither does gnumeric (please correct me if I'm wrong).

Also, when looking at a file in abiword vs openoffice, the text is actually larger and more readable in openoffice, don't ask me why, just seems that way.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=128836\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

My experience is that OO is decades slower than abiword in loading and manipulating files that are in MS format -- like all the ones you get in e-mail.  Also, formatting of such documents is considerably worse in OO -- for me -- than abiword or gnumeric.  Gnumeric OTOH has features missing in OO and Excel that I like, such as being able to pass more arguments to commands.   There are simple things I needed to do that xls format would not handle, but gnumeric did.

I would imagine that the native OO formats are better than the MS formats, but who would bother with a word processor like that if it weren't for people shoving MS documents in your face all the time?
Zaurus:  SL C3100
ROM:  eabi debian/sid

Hrw

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1366
    • View Profile
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #47 on: June 01, 2006, 03:08:46 am »
Quote
But why the urge to use OO?  I find that Abiword, on my Z or my desktop, to be so much more responsive that I never use OO.  And as far as spreadsheets go, gnumeric is the standard now, IMNSHO.[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=128835\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Sorry guys but I have to say that - I think that possibility to run OpenOffice.org on Z is like 'my penis is bigger then yours' talks. This beast is big & slow on desktops so why install it on Zaurus? Just because it can be possible? Man... I know that we can add 8GB microdrives, use NFS and then build native gentoo/LFS/other stuff or run dnetc or other crappy  SETI but do we have to?
OpenZaurus 3.5.4x Release Manager
OpenEmbedded, Ångström, Poky developer
My website

Misc embedded hardware.

omro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 796
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #48 on: June 01, 2006, 04:34:21 am »
Quote
My experience is that OO is decades slower than abiword in loading and manipulating files that are in MS format -- like all the ones you get in e-mail.  Also, formatting of such documents is considerably worse in OO -- for me -- than abiword or gnumeric.  Gnumeric OTOH has features missing in OO and Excel that I like, such as being able to pass more arguments to commands.   There are simple things I needed to do that xls format would not handle, but gnumeric did.

I would imagine that the native OO formats are better than the MS formats, but who would bother with a word processor like that if it weren't for people shoving MS documents in your face all the time?
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129221\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

When I open documents in gnumeric and abiword I spend ages faffing with the zoom and resizing cells so I can see the contents clearly. Never had that issue with open office.

Open Office 2 is WAY faster then OO1
Zaurus C-1000

desertrat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 743
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #49 on: June 01, 2006, 05:20:04 am »
Quote
Sorry guys but I have to say that - I think that possibility to run OpenOffice.org on Z is like 'my penis is bigger then yours' talks. This beast is big & slow on desktops so why install it on Zaurus? Just because it can be possible? Man... I know that we can add 8GB microdrives, use NFS and then build native gentoo/LFS/other stuff or run dnetc or other crappy  SETI but do we have to?
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129247\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
As far as wordprocessing and spreadsheets go, yes they can usually be better addressed by Abiword and Gnumeric. But for drawing diagrams there really is no adequate substitute for OOo Draw. I know there's Inkscape, but it has various issues - chief among them is WYSI(not)WYG, eg fills don't print.

And as for 'my penis is bigger than yours' in relation to the number of packages available for the various roms/distros, a more useful measure would be "are the application(s) that you want/need to use available"?

-- cheers
SL-C3100 / Ambicon WL1100C-CF / pdaXrom 1.1.0beta3 / IceWM

omro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 796
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #50 on: June 01, 2006, 05:56:18 am »
Quote
a more useful measure would be "are the application(s) that you want/need to use available"?

-- cheers
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129271\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

I totally agree. Meanie's OOo runs perfectly fast enough for me. If I could only have it without the little spreadsheet bug, I'd be happier.

I bet you, if you compile OOo for the Z, people will use it.
Zaurus C-1000

clofland

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 247
    • View Profile
    • http://www.lofland.net/
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #51 on: June 01, 2006, 09:29:58 am »
This was the pdaX vs. OZ w/ GPE thread, right?

I hear a lot of "this is faster than that" and "this is more standards compliant than that" talk from the OZ/pdaX battle, but what really matters to most of us is perceived usability. Microsoft relies on that you know, their software may be inefficient, slow and buggy, but most people perceive that that they can get what they want done with it. Obviously we all know better, but the same does apply here. Unless the speed gains are HUGE, and they rarely are, few will switch "ROMs" unless there is a perceived usability benefit.

So, from the standpoint of perceived usability, what does OZ w/ GPE have to offer? I tried the latest OZ/GPE this week, and was kind of unimpressed. Probably some more documentation (which pdaX also needs) and a greater desire to learn would have helped, but I was longing for pdaX.

What does GPE offer to the user that pdaX does not? Is there something fundamental that I am missing?

(On a side note, where can I find doc's for GPE, as in, the keyboard layout (just where IS the ALT key) and window managment (how DO I resize windows)?)
C-760 Last Running pdaXrom 1.1.0beta3
- Sandisk UltraII 1GB SD card - Socket LP CF LAN card - Socket LP CF WLAN card - Socket CF Bluetooth Card Rev H -

desertrat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 743
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #52 on: June 01, 2006, 10:43:48 am »
Quote
Can you please tell which .ipk you have used to do this?
Is this it: icewm-pdaxrom_0.0.5-2_armv5tel.ipk? Is that all you need to install?
No, that only contains the pdaxrom specific configuration files. You need to the install icewm_XXX.ipk as well.

Quote
Also: how do you launch icewm, after it is installed? With startx?
I believe icewm-pdaxrom overwrites startx, so yes, just startx.

Quote
Do you maybe need to remove matchbox first?
No. But after using icewm you wouldn't want to go back to matchbox.

For more info read these:
https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showt...=19412&hl=icewm
https://www.oesf.org/forums/index.php?showt...=18891&hl=icewm

-- cheers
SL-C3100 / Ambicon WL1100C-CF / pdaXrom 1.1.0beta3 / IceWM

ShiroiKuma

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 900
    • View Profile
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #53 on: June 02, 2006, 08:10:11 am »
Quote
As far as wordprocessing and spreadsheets go, yes they can usually be better addressed by Abiword and Gnumeric. But for drawing diagrams there really is no adequate substitute for OOo Draw. I know there's Inkscape, but it has various issues - chief among them is WYSI(not)WYG, eg fills don't print.

And as for 'my penis is bigger than yours' in relation to the number of packages available for the various roms/distros, a more useful measure would be "are the application(s) that you want/need to use available"?
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129271\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
I unpacked the ARM OpenOffice installer under GPE. Ran the install script, it copied the app. When you try to run the setup however or soffice directly, it launches, but after a while I get:
Code: [Select]
I18N: X Window System doesn't support locale "C"
/usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.4/program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.4/program/libvcl645lr.so: undefined symbol: XkbQueryExtension
The locale shouldn't be a prob. I've searched on the XkbQueryExtension thing, but can't find anything indicative...
[span style=\'font-size:8pt;line-height:100%\']Das ganze tschechische Volk ist eine Simulantenbande.[/font][/span]
Militäroberarzt Bautze

omro

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 796
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #54 on: June 02, 2006, 12:01:27 pm »
Quote
I unpacked the ARM OpenOffice installer under GPE. Ran the install script, it copied the app. When you try to run the setup however or soffice directly, it launches, but after a while I get:
Code: [Select]
I18N: X Window System doesn't support locale "C"
/usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.4/program/soffice.bin: symbol lookup error: /usr/local/OpenOffice.org1.1.4/program/libvcl645lr.so: undefined symbol: XkbQueryExtension
The locale shouldn't be a prob. I've searched on the XkbQueryExtension thing, but can't find anything indicative...
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129456\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

Might want to post that in the GPE or OZ/Common forums if you haven't already
Zaurus C-1000

tg

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 145
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #55 on: June 02, 2006, 01:29:07 pm »
Quote
This was the pdaX vs. OZ w/ GPE thread, right?


What does GPE offer to the user that pdaX does not? Is there something fundamental that I am missing?


[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129303\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

I think fundamental difference has less to do with speed or particular packages being on one vs other ROM and more with development focus. OZ may be attractive if you believe that due to the fact it is targeted for many devices when you in the future migrate to some other linux device you may get OZ/GPE you are already familiar with. It seems like pdaX is primarily focused on getting as much as possible specifically out of Zaurus and the portability is not the primary focus (but because there is so much more focus on Z you get developer to pay more attention to make apps finetuned for Z?).
To be fair I need to point out that I have not used OZ or pdaX up until now since I'm still waiting for someone from either distribution to announce that some browser works on those ROMS as smoothly as Opera does on Cacko - it seems like many have asked this question (many times) but I have not seen a satisfactory answer that would make me switch - and browser is something I use far more often than any other app.

adf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #56 on: June 02, 2006, 03:00:04 pm »
Quote
Quote
This was the pdaX vs. OZ w/ GPE thread, right?


What does GPE offer to the user that pdaX does not? Is there something fundamental that I am missing?


[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129303\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

I think fundamental difference has less to do with speed or particular packages being on one vs other ROM and more with development focus. OZ may be attractive if you believe that due to the fact it is targeted for many devices when you in the future migrate to some other linux device you may get OZ/GPE you are already familiar with. It seems like pdaX is primarily focused on getting as much as possible specifically out of Zaurus and the portability is not the primary focus (but because there is so much more focus on Z you get developer to pay more attention to make apps finetuned for Z?).
To be fair I need to point out that I have not used OZ or pdaX up until now since I'm still waiting for someone from either distribution to announce that some browser works on those ROMS as smoothly as Opera does on Cacko - it seems like many have asked this question (many times) but I have not seen a satisfactory answer that would make me switch - and browser is something I use far more often than any other app.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129487\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]

yeah.  people from both systems have mentioned qvfb to run qtopia apps.  I haven't heard from anyone actually doing it.  I think it is worth pursuing on both gpe and pdax.The sources are on the trolltech site;pick your favorite dev environment and have at it.  If no one else does, I might give it a go this summer, though i'm far less wizardly than many of the other users of either system.

edit:  on the other hand, opera 7.x is getting pretty ##@!!! old. netfront on Z has been atg 3.1 for at least a year.   In the world of qt the only movement seems to be rumors of work on konqueror in opie.  in the X world firefox is getting better and better and gpe has a shiny new browser.  One loaded, firefox is, imho, hands down better than opera.
« Last Edit: June 02, 2006, 03:05:50 pm by adf »
**3100 Zubuntu Jaunty,(working on Cacko dualboot), 16G A-Data internal CF, 4G SD, Ambicom WL-1100C Cf, linksys usb ethernet,  BelkinF8T020 BT card, Belkin F8U1500-E Ir kbd, mini targus usb mouse, rechargeble AC/DC powered USB hub, psp cables and battery extenders.

**6000l  Tetsuized Sharprom, installed on internal flash only 1G sd, 2G cf

ThirtyOne

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 86
    • View Profile
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #57 on: June 02, 2006, 03:14:00 pm »
I use pdaXrom.

I still find Firefox to be heavy and slow, but it is great to have full compatibility with desktop browsers.  I have even done firefox extension development on my z.

I use Dillo whenever I can and only fall back on Firefox when I absolutely have to.

adf

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2807
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #58 on: June 02, 2006, 03:36:40 pm »
Quote
I use pdaXrom.

I still find Firefox to be heavy and slow, but it is great to have full compatibility with desktop browsers.  I have even done firefox extension development on my z.

I use Dillo whenever I can and only fall back on Firefox when I absolutely have to.
[div align=\"right\"][a href=\"index.php?act=findpost&pid=129501\"][{POST_SNAPBACK}][/a][/div]
Have you had much luck handling proxy servers with dillo?

I've found that often one or another incarnation of links goes a long way toward filling in the gaps.
**3100 Zubuntu Jaunty,(working on Cacko dualboot), 16G A-Data internal CF, 4G SD, Ambicom WL-1100C Cf, linksys usb ethernet,  BelkinF8T020 BT card, Belkin F8U1500-E Ir kbd, mini targus usb mouse, rechargeble AC/DC powered USB hub, psp cables and battery extenders.

**6000l  Tetsuized Sharprom, installed on internal flash only 1G sd, 2G cf

ZDevil

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1998
    • View Profile
    • http://
Pdaxrom Vs Oz & Gpe
« Reply #59 on: June 11, 2006, 01:09:21 pm »
Let's turn the question around.

I have a C860 and C1000. I don't really mind to try out the latest results from both the pdaX and OZ sides. On the one hand it seems weird to the seemingly not so large Zaurus user/development communities; but on the other hand having real stuff ready to try out implies (relatively speaking) mature and active development status and enough diversities -- Cacko, OZ, pdaX. Granted that the Zaurii is the leading species in the kingdom of embedded Linux, having several strong breeds will actually do no harm but demonstrate that the ongoing evolution is gaining momentum.  

My next plan is once Beta4 issues are fixed and streamlined on my C1000, I will try OZ (Opie or GPE) on my C860, and then I'll begin to see the strengths and weaknesses on both sides in my eyes. I just don't feel comfortable at all to keep  switching back and forth, as I do need my Zaurus to do real work in real life; nor do I feel secure when ppl keep telling me "You need ABC? Okay, that's (theoretically) possible if you do/install/tweak XYZ" without any real user out there actually sharing real stories.
« Last Edit: June 11, 2006, 01:14:09 pm by ZDevil »

Life is too precious for hacking *too much*
Visit my Z screencap gallery[/color]
My EeePC 701 Black = Debian (Lenny) on IceRocks + Transcend SDHC Class6 8GB + 2GB RAM
My Zaurus SL-C3200 = Debian EABI (kernel 2.6.24.3-yonggun) on a swapped internal Sandisk Extreme III CF 16gb
My Debian EABI feed: http://matrixmen.free.fr/zaurus/debian/
My OpenBSD/Zaurus feeds:  Link1, Link2
[/i][/font][/color][/size]