This was the pdaX vs. OZ w/ GPE thread, right?
I hear a lot of "this is faster than that" and "this is more standards compliant than that" talk from the OZ/pdaX battle, but what really matters to most of us is perceived usability. Microsoft relies on that you know, their software may be inefficient, slow and buggy, but most people perceive that that they can get what they want done with it. Obviously we all know better, but the same does apply here. Unless the speed gains are HUGE, and they rarely are, few will switch "ROMs" unless there is a perceived usability benefit.
So, from the standpoint of perceived usability, what does OZ w/ GPE have to offer? I tried the latest OZ/GPE this week, and was kind of unimpressed. Probably some more documentation (which pdaX also needs) and a greater desire to learn would have helped, but I was longing for pdaX.
What does GPE offer to the user that pdaX does not? Is there something fundamental that I am missing?
(On a side note, where can I find doc's for GPE, as in, the keyboard layout (just where IS the ALT key) and window managment (how DO I resize windows)?)